Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Charged-impurity scattering in graphene

Open access
Chen, J.-H., Jang, C., Adam, S., Fuhrer, M. S., Williams, E. D., Ishigami, M.·2008·Nature Physics

Abstract

Valuable insight into the influence of scattering from impurities on the peculiar electronic properties of graphene are gained by a systematic study of how its conductivity changes with increasing concentration of potassium ions deposited on its surface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys935

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,477

Metadata

Authors
Chen, J.-H., Jang, C., Adam, S., Fuhrer, M. S., Williams, E. D., & Ishigami, M.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2008-04-13
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
377-381
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2115581621
Cited by
1,477
References
5
FWCI
56.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.