Cited by 169Asthma and respiratory diseasesMedication Adherence and ComplianceAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Patient-reported side effects, concerns and adherence to corticosteroid treatment for asthma, and comparison with physician estimates of side-effect prevalence: a UK-wide, cross-sectional study

Open access
Cooper, Vanessa, Metcalf, Leanne, Versnel, Jenny, Upton, Jane, Walker, Samantha, Horne, Rob·2015·npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Background: Non-adherence to corticosteroid treatment has been shown to reduce treatment efficacy, thus compromising asthma control. Aims: To examine the experiences of treatment side effects, treatment concerns and adherence to inhaled (ICS) and oral corticosteroids (OCS) among people with asthma and to identify the degree of concordance between clinician estimates of side effects and the prevalence reported by patients. Methods: Asthma UK members were sent validated questionnaires assessing treatment concerns, experiences of side effects and adherence. Questionnaires measuring clinicians’ estimates of the prevalence of corticosteroid side effects were completed online. Results: Completed questionnaires were returned by 1,524 people taking ICS, 233 taking OCS and 244 clinicians (67% of clinicians were primary care nurses). Among people with asthma, 64% of those taking ICS and 88% of those taking OCS reported ⩾1 side effect. People reporting high adherence to ICS (t=−3.09, P<0.005) and those reporting low adherence to OCS (t=1.86, P<0.05; one-tailed test) reported more side effects. There was a disparity between clinicians’ estimates of the frequency of side effects and the frequency reported by people with asthma: e.g., although 46% of people taking ICS reported sore throat, clinicians estimated that this figure would be 10%. Patients who reported side effects had stronger concerns about both ICS (r=0.46, P<0.0001) and OCS (r=0.50, P<0.0001). Concerns about corticosteroids were associated with low adherence to ICS (t=6.90, P<0.0001) and OCS (t=1.71; P<0.05; one-tailed test). Conclusions: An unexpectedly large proportion of people with asthma experienced side effects and had strong concerns about their treatment, which compromised adherence. These findings have implications for the design of interventions to optimise asthma control through improved adherence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.26

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 169

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Society BT. British guideline on the management of asthma: revised edition 2009. http://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/ClinicalInformation/Asthma/AsthmaGuidelines/tabid/83/Default.aspx ] webcite.

Authors
Cooper, V., Metcalf, L., Versnel, J., Upton, J., Walker, S., & Horne, R.
Affiliations
  • UCL School of Pharmacy (GB)
  • Asthma UK (GB)
Venue
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Published
2015-07-09
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
15026-15026
ISSN
2055-1010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W751328058
Cited by
169
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10197)
  • Asthma and Lung UK
  • Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
asthma, corticosteroid adverse effects, medication adherence, inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids, patient concerns, patient-reported outcomes, sore throat, asthma control
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Administration, Oral, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Aged, Asthma, Mental Disorders, Candidiasis, Oral, Contusions, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stomatognathic Diseases, Pharyngitis, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Weight Gain, Prevalence, Medication Adherence, Self Report, Physicians, Primary Care, Primary Care Nursing, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review