Cited by 97Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Subjective and neural responses to intravenous alcohol in young adults with light and heavy drinking patterns

Open access
Gilman, Jodi M, Ramchandani, Vijay A, Crouss, Tess, Hommer, Daniel W·2012·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Heavy alcohol consumption during young adulthood is a risk factor for the development of serious alcohol use disorders. Research has shown that individual differences in subjective responses to alcohol may affect individuals' vulnerability to developing alcoholism. Studies comparing the subjective and objective response to alcohol between light and heavy drinkers (HDs), however, have yielded inconsistent results, and neural responses to alcohol in these groups have not been characterized. We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover alcohol challenge study comparing functional magnetic resonance imaging and subjective response to intravenously administered 6% v/v ethanol to a target blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or placebo between HDs and social drinkers (SDs). During the imaging, we presented emotional cues in order to measure how emotion modulated the effects of alcohol on the brain's reward circuitry. We found that, at equivalent blood alcohol concentrations, HDs reported lower subjective alcohol effects than SDs. Alcohol significantly activated the nucleus accumbens in SDs, but not in HDs. Self-reported ratings of intoxication correlated with striatal activation, suggesting that activation may reflect subjective experience of intoxication. Fearful faces significantly activated the amygdala in the SDs only, and this activation was attenuated by alcohol. This study shows that HDs not only experience reduced subjective effects of alcohol, but also demonstrate a blunted response to alcohol in the brain's reward system. Our findings indicate that reduced subjective and neural response to alcohol in HDs may be suggestive of either the development of tolerance to alcohol, or of pre-existing decreased sensitivity to alcohol's effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2011.206

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 97

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First MB, Spitzer RL, Robert L, Gibbon M, Williams JBL, Janet BW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  2. Matsumoto D. Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion and Neutral Faces. San Francisco State University: San Francisco; 1988. [Google Scholar]

Authors
Gilman, J. M., Ramchandani, V. A., Crouss, T., & Hommer, D. W.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Gilman, Jodi M
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
467-477
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2032477105
Cited by
97
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA034093)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
heavy drinking, alcohol challenge, nucleus accumbens, striatal activation, amygdala, alcohol tolerance, alcohol sensitivity, social drinkers, young adults, alcohol use disorder risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Brain, Brain Mapping, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review