Cited by 6Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorHumor Studies and ApplicationsInfant Health and Development

Erratum: No Laughing Matter: Intranasal Oxytocin Administration Changes Functional Brain Connectivity during Exposure to Infant Laughter

Open access
Riem, Madelon M E, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H, Tops, Mattie, Boksem, Maarten A S, Rombouts, Serge A R B, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J·2012·Neuropsychopharmacology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2012.27

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 6

Authors
Riem, M. M. E., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Tops, M., Boksem, M. A. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2012-07-16
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
2174-2174
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W4245526610
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, infant laughter, brain functional connectivity, intranasal drug delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review