A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial Assessing the Efficacy of ABT-436, a Novel V1b Receptor Antagonist, for Alcohol Dependence
Open accessAbstract
Alcohol use disorder has been linked to dysregulation of the brain stress systems, producing a negative emotional state leading to chronic relapsing behavior. Vasopressin receptors appear to have a regulatory role in stress, anxiety, and alcohol. This study evaluated the novel compound, ABT-436, a V1b receptor antagonist, in alcohol-dependent participants in a 12-week clinical trial. Men and women (n=150) who met criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence were recruited across four sites. Participants received double-blind ABT-436 or placebo, and a computerized behavioral intervention. ABT-436 was titrated to 800 mg/day during weeks 2-12. Although the primary outcome, percentage of heavy drinking days, was lower in participants receiving ABT-436 compared with placebo, this difference was not statistically significant (31.3 vs 37.6, respectively; p=0.172; d=0.20). However, participants receiving ABT-436 had significantly greater percentage of days abstinent than those receiving placebo (51.2 vs 41.6, respectively; p=0.037; d=0.31). No significant differences were found between treatment groups on any other measures of drinking, alcohol craving, or alcohol-related consequences. Smokers receiving ABT-436 smoked significantly fewer cigarettes per week than those receiving placebo (p=0.046). ABT-436 was well tolerated, with diarrhea (mild-to-moderate severity) being the most common side effect. In subgroup analyses, participants with relatively higher baseline levels of stress responded better to ABT-436 than placebo on select drinking outcomes, suggesting there may be value in testing medications targeting the vasopressin receptor in high stress, alcohol-dependent patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a 12-week, multisite, randomized clinical trial in 150 alcohol-dependent individuals, the selective V1b receptor antagonist ABT-436 significantly increased the percentage of days abstinent compared with placebo.
“In a 12-week, multisite, randomized clinical trial in 150 alcohol-dependent individuals, the selective V 1b receptor antagonist ABT-436 significantly increased the percentage of days abstinent compared with placebo (Ryan et al., 2017).”
From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Ryan et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 72
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [32]32. Miller W (1995). The drinker inventory of consequences (DrInC): an instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuseInMattson M, Marshall LA(eds). NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series Vol. 4. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: Bethesda, MD. pp 1-94.
- Authors
- for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Clinical Investigations Group (NCIG) Study Group, Ryan, M. L., Falk, D. E., Fertig, J. B., Rendenbach-Mueller, B., Katz, D. A., Tracy, K. A., Strain, E. C., Dunn, K. E., Kampman, K., Mahoney, E., Ciraulo, D. A., Sickles-Colaneri, L., Ait-Daoud, N., Johnson, B. A., Ransom, J., Scott, C., Koob, G. F., & Litten, R. Z.
- Affiliations
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Boston University (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Fast Track Drugs and Biologics (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuropsychopharmacology
- Published
- 2016-09-23
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1012-1023
- ISSN
- 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
- 1740-634X
- PMC
- PMC5506792
- OpenAlex
- W2521147165
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- www.nature.com
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- alcoholism, heavy drinking days, alcohol abstinence, alcohol craving, smoking, stress, pharmacotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Anxiety, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Receptors, Vasopressin, Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review