The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Memristance can explain Spike-Time-Dependent-Plasticity in Neural Synapses
Open accessAbstract
Interdisciplinary research broadens the view of particular problems yielding fresh and possibly unexpected insights. This is the case of neuromorphic engineering where technology and neuroscience cross-fertilize each other. For example, consider on one side the recently discovered memristor, postulated in 1974, thanks to research in nanotechnology electronics. On the other side, consider the mechanism known as Spike-Time-Dependent-Plasticity (STDP) which describes a neuronal synaptic learning mechanism that outperforms the traditional Hebbian synaptic plasticity proposed in 1949. STDP was originally postulated as a computer learning algorithm, and is being used by the machine intelligence and computational neuroscience community. At the same time its biological and physiological foundations have been reasonably well established during the past decade. If memristance and STDP can be related, then (a) recent discoveries in nanophysics and nanoelectronic principles may shed new lights into understanding the intricate molecular and physiological mechanisms behind STDP in neuroscience, and (b) new neuromorphic-like computers built out of nanotechnology memristive devices could incorporate the biological STDP mechanisms yielding a new generation of self-adaptive ultra-high-dense intelligent machines. Here we show that by combining memristance models with the electrical wave signals of neural impulses (spikes) converging from pre- and post-synaptic neurons into a synaptic junction, STDP behavior emerges naturally. This result serves to understand how neural and memristance parameters modulate STDP, which might bring new insights to neurophysiologists in searching for the ultimate physiological mechanisms responsible for STDP in biological synapses. At the same time, this result also provides a direct mean to incorporate STDP learning mechanisms into a new generation of nanotechnology computers employing memristors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The future of electronics based on memristive systems
Zidan, M. A., Strachan, J. P., & Lu, W. D. (2018) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-017-0006-8 · Cited by 2,138
Experimental demonstration of associative memory with memristive neural networks
Pershin, Y. V., & Di Ventra, M. (2010) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2010.05.001 · Cited by 1,041
If it's pinched it's a memristor
Chua, L. (2014) · Semiconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0268-1242/29/10/104001 · Cited by 685
Learning through ferroelectric domain dynamics in solid-state synapses
Boyn, S., Grollier, J., Lecerf, G., Xu, B., Locatelli, N., Fusil, S., Girod, S., Carrétéro, C., Garcia, K., Xavier, S., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14736 · Cited by 600
On Spike-Timing-Dependent-Plasticity, Memristive Devices, and Building a Self-Learning Visual Cortex
Zamarreño-Ramos, C., Camuñas-Mesa, L. A., Pérez-Carrasco, J. A., Masquelier, T., Serrano-Gotarredona, T., & Linares-Barranco, B. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00026 · Cited by 558
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Linares-Barranco, B., & Serrano-Gotarredona, T.
- Venue
- Nature Precedings
- Published
- 2009-03-31
- ISSN
- 1756-0357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1783145639
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memristance can explain Spike-Time-Dependent-Plasticity in Neural Synapses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/npre.2009.3010.1
- The paper
- Linares-Barranco, B., & Serrano-Gotarredona, T. (2009). Memristance can explain Spike-Time-Dependent-Plasticity in Neural Synapses. Nature Precedings. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3010.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.