Housing, husbandry and handling of rodents for behavioral experiments
Abstract
Most animals used in research are rodents, mainly mice because of their predominance in genetics and molecular biology. This article attempts to provide an introduction to mice and rats: health considerations (of the experimenter); choice of species, age, strain and sex; housing and environmental enrichment; and animal identification, handling and dosing. These considerations apply to animal work in general; the rest of the article focuses on the preliminary aspects of behavioral testing, including a protocol for an open field test. This procedure is traditionally associated with activity measurements, and although automated versions are readily available these days, the latter are expensive and may be unavailable in many non-behavioral departments. Moreover, particularly when testing novel genetically modified animals or pharmacological agents, there is no substitute for direct visual observation to detect abnormal signs in the animals: for example, ptosis, piloerection, tremor, ataxia or exophthalmos. The open field test can be adapted in several ways: to assess general behavior and activity (similar to a primary screen in the pharmaceutical industry) or to measure memory (habituation) or anxiety.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rats are preferred for behavioral, memory, and cognitive research due to their physiological similarities to humans and their high learning capacity.
“Rats are preferred for behavioral, memory, and cognitive research due to their physiological similarities to humans and their high learning capacity [17–20].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 246
- Authors
- Deacon, R. M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Deacon, Robert M J
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 936-946
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W2074720474
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (GR065438MA)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- rodent housing, rodent husbandry, open field test, environmental enrichment, animal identification, animal handling, dosage, mouse strain selection, age and sex effects, anxiety assessment, memory assessment, genetically modified mice, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Behavior, Animal, Female, Housing, Animal, Male, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review