Cited by 71Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Prospective isolation of adult neural stem cells from the mouse subependymal zone

Fischer, Judith, Beckervordersandforth, Ruth, Tripathi, Pratibha, Steiner-Mezzadri, Andrea, Ninkovic, Jovica, Götz, Magdalena·2011·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) have the remarkable capacity to self-renew and the lifelong ability to generate neurons in the adult mammalian brain. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms contributing to these behaviors are still not understood. Now that prospective isolation of the NSCs has become feasible, these mechanisms can be studied. Here we describe a protocol for the efficient isolation of adult NSCs, by the application of a dual-labeling strategy on the basis of their glial identity and ciliated nature. The cells are isolated from the lateral ventricular subependymal zone (SEZ) of adult hGFAP-eGFP (human glial fibrillary acidic protein-enhanced green fluorescent protein) transgenic mice by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Staining against prominin1 (CD133) allows the isolation of the NSCs (hGFAP-eGFP(+)/prominin1(+)), which can be further subdivided by labeling with the fluorescent epidermal growth factor. This protocol, which can be completed in 7 h, allows the assessment of quantitative changes in SEZ NSCs and the examination of their molecular and functional characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2011.412

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 71

Authors
Fischer, J., Beckervordersandforth, R., Tripathi, P., Steiner-Mezzadri, A., Ninkovic, J., & Götz, M.
Affiliations
Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Götz, Magdalena
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2011-11-17
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
1981-1989
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W1981407045
Cited by
71
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
adult neural stem cells, subventricular zone, glial fibrillary acidic protein, CD133, epidermal growth factor receptor, lateral ventricle, self-renewal, neurogenesis, transgenic mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cell Separation, Flow Cytometry, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Cell Culture Techniques, Microdissection, Mice, Neural Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review