Prospective isolation of adult neural stem cells from the mouse subependymal zone
Abstract
Neural stem cells (NSCs) have the remarkable capacity to self-renew and the lifelong ability to generate neurons in the adult mammalian brain. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms contributing to these behaviors are still not understood. Now that prospective isolation of the NSCs has become feasible, these mechanisms can be studied. Here we describe a protocol for the efficient isolation of adult NSCs, by the application of a dual-labeling strategy on the basis of their glial identity and ciliated nature. The cells are isolated from the lateral ventricular subependymal zone (SEZ) of adult hGFAP-eGFP (human glial fibrillary acidic protein-enhanced green fluorescent protein) transgenic mice by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Staining against prominin1 (CD133) allows the isolation of the NSCs (hGFAP-eGFP(+)/prominin1(+)), which can be further subdivided by labeling with the fluorescent epidermal growth factor. This protocol, which can be completed in 7 h, allows the assessment of quantitative changes in SEZ NSCs and the examination of their molecular and functional characteristics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FACS gates were set by the use of isotype controls.
“Gates were set by the use of isotype controls (Fischer et al., 2011).”
From Defining the Adult Neural Stem Cell Niche Proteome Identifies Key Regulators of Adult Neurogenesis (2020) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Fischer, J., Beckervordersandforth, R., Tripathi, P., Steiner-Mezzadri, A., Ninkovic, J., & Götz, M.
- Affiliations
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Götz, Magdalena
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2011-11-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1981-1989
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W1981407045
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- adult neural stem cells, subventricular zone, glial fibrillary acidic protein, CD133, epidermal growth factor receptor, lateral ventricle, self-renewal, neurogenesis, transgenic mice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Cell Separation, Flow Cytometry, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Cell Culture Techniques, Microdissection, Mice, Neural Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review