Cited by 81Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Quantitative mapping of fluorescently tagged cellular proteins using FCS-calibrated four-dimensional imaging

Open access
Politi, Antonio Z, Cai, Yin, Walther, Nike, Hossain, M Julius, Koch, Birgit, Wachsmuth, Malte, Ellenberg, Jan·2018·Nature Protocols

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The ability to tag a protein at its endogenous locus with a fluorescent protein (FP) enables quantitative understanding of protein dynamics at the physiological level. Genome-editing technology has now made this powerful approach routinely applicable to mammalian cells and many other model systems, thereby opening up the possibility to systematically and quantitatively map the cellular proteome in four dimensions. 3D time-lapse confocal microscopy (4D imaging) is an essential tool for investigating spatial and temporal protein dynamics; however, it lacks the required quantitative power to make the kind of absolute and comparable measurements required for systems analysis. In contrast, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) provides quantitative proteomic and biophysical parameters such as protein concentration, hydrodynamic radius, and oligomerization but lacks the capability for high-throughput application in 4D spatial and temporal imaging. Here we present an automated experimental and computational workflow that integrates both methods and delivers quantitative 4D imaging data in high throughput. These data are processed to yield a calibration curve relating the fluorescence intensities (FIs) of image voxels to the absolute protein abundance. The calibration curve allows the conversion of the arbitrary FIs to protein amounts for all voxels of 4D imaging stacks. Using our workflow, users can acquire and analyze hundreds of FCS-calibrated image series to map their proteins of interest in four dimensions. Compared with other protocols, the current protocol does not require additional calibration standards and provides an automated acquisition pipeline for FCS and imaging data. The protocol can be completed in 1 d.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2018.040

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Politi, A. Z., Cai, Y., Walther, N., Hossain, M. J., Koch, B., Wachsmuth, M., & Ellenberg, J.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Medical Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Ellenberg, Jan
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
1445-1464
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2950446586
Cited by
81
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (EU-FP7, 653706, 258068, 241548)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA047728)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U01EB021223)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, 4D imaging, fluorescent protein tagging, protein abundance quantification, fluorescence intensity calibration, time-lapse confocal microscopy, protein dynamics, automated image acquisition, high-throughput proteomics
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Cells, Proteins, Staining and Labeling, Proteome, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Proteomics, Automation, Laboratory, Optical Imaging, Spatio-Temporal Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review