Quantitative mapping of fluorescently tagged cellular proteins using FCS-calibrated four-dimensional imaging
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The ability to tag a protein at its endogenous locus with a fluorescent protein (FP) enables quantitative understanding of protein dynamics at the physiological level. Genome-editing technology has now made this powerful approach routinely applicable to mammalian cells and many other model systems, thereby opening up the possibility to systematically and quantitatively map the cellular proteome in four dimensions. 3D time-lapse confocal microscopy (4D imaging) is an essential tool for investigating spatial and temporal protein dynamics; however, it lacks the required quantitative power to make the kind of absolute and comparable measurements required for systems analysis. In contrast, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) provides quantitative proteomic and biophysical parameters such as protein concentration, hydrodynamic radius, and oligomerization but lacks the capability for high-throughput application in 4D spatial and temporal imaging. Here we present an automated experimental and computational workflow that integrates both methods and delivers quantitative 4D imaging data in high throughput. These data are processed to yield a calibration curve relating the fluorescence intensities (FIs) of image voxels to the absolute protein abundance. The calibration curve allows the conversion of the arbitrary FIs to protein amounts for all voxels of 4D imaging stacks. Using our workflow, users can acquire and analyze hundreds of FCS-calibrated image series to map their proteins of interest in four dimensions. Compared with other protocols, the current protocol does not require additional calibration standards and provides an automated acquisition pipeline for FCS and imaging data. The protocol can be completed in 1 d.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
Shaner, N. C., Campbell, R. E., Steinbach, P. A., Giepmans, B. N. G., Palmer, A. E., & Tsien, R. Y. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1037 · Cited by 4,619 · see citing works
Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins
Lam, A. J., St-Pierre, F., Gong, Y., Marshall, J. D., Cranfill, P. J., Baird, M. A., McKeown, M. R., Wiedenmann, J., Davidson, M. W., Schnitzer, M. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2171 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Generation and validation of homozygous fluorescent knock-in cells using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Koch, B., Nijmeijer, B., Kueblbeck, M., Cai, Y., Walther, N., & Ellenberg, J. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2018.042 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental and computational framework for a dynamic protein atlas of human cell division
Cai, Y., Hossain, M. J., Hériché, J.-K., Politi, A. Z., Walther, N., Koch, B., Wachsmuth, M., Nijmeijer, B., Kueblbeck, M., Martinic-Kavur, M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0518-z · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generation and validation of homozygous fluorescent knock-in cells using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Koch, B., Nijmeijer, B., Kueblbeck, M., Cai, Y., Walther, N., & Ellenberg, J. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2018.042 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental and computational framework for a dynamic protein atlas of human cell division
Cai, Y., Hossain, M. J., Hériché, J.-K., Politi, A. Z., Walther, N., Koch, B., Wachsmuth, M., Nijmeijer, B., Kueblbeck, M., Martinic-Kavur, M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0518-z · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Politi, A. Z., Cai, Y., Walther, N., Hossain, M. J., Koch, B., Wachsmuth, M., & Ellenberg, J.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Medical Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ellenberg, Jan
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2018-05-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1445-1464
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- PMC
- PMC6609853
- OpenAlex
- W2950446586
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (EU-FP7, 653706, 258068, 241548)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA047728)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U01EB021223)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
- Keywords
- fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, 4D imaging, fluorescent protein tagging, protein abundance quantification, fluorescence intensity calibration, time-lapse confocal microscopy, protein dynamics, automated image acquisition, high-throughput proteomics
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Cells, Proteins, Staining and Labeling, Proteome, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Proteomics, Automation, Laboratory, Optical Imaging, Spatio-Temporal Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review