Transposable elements in cancer
Abstract
Transposable elements give rise to interspersed repeats, sequences that comprise most of our genomes. These mobile DNAs have been historically underappreciated - both because they have been presumed to be unimportant, and because their high copy number and variability pose unique technical challenges. Neither impediment now seems steadfast. Interest in the human mobilome has never been greater, and methods enabling its study are maturing at a fast pace. This Review describes the activity of transposable elements in human cancers, particularly long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1). LINE-1 sequences are self-propagating, protein-coding retrotransposons, and their activity results in somatically acquired insertions in cancer genomes. Altered expression of transposable elements and animation of genomic LINE-1 sequences appear to be hallmarks of cancer, and can be responsible for driving mutations in tumorigenesis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The extent to which transposable elements are involved in human disorders and drive disease pathogenesis is currently unknown.
“While transposable element activation has also been implicated in cancer6, and TDP-43 mediated neurodegeneration7–9, the extent to which transposable elements are involved in human disorders and drive disease pathogenesis is currently unknown.”
From Pathogenic tau-induced piRNA depletion promotes neuronal death through transposable element dysregulation in neurodegenerative tauopathies (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 169 · Cited by 572
- Authors
- Burns, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burns, Kathleen H.
- ORCID
- Burns, Kathleen H.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Cancer
- Published
- 2017-06-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 415-424
- ISSN
- 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1768
- OpenAlex
- W2623862783
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 169
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- LINE-1, retrotransposons, transposable elements, somatic insertions, cancer genomics, interspersed repeats, mobilome, carcinogenesis, retrotransposition
- MeSH terms
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, DNA Transposable Elements, Humans, Neoplasms, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Open Reading Frames, Minisatellite Repeats, Terminal Repeat Sequences, Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements, Short Interspersed Nucleotide Elements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review