Cited by 1,286Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysHeat shock proteins researchPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

Regulating the p53 pathway: in vitro hypotheses, in vivo veritas

Toledo, Franck, Wahl, Geoffrey M.·2006·Nature reviews. Cancer

Abstract

Mutations in TP53, the gene that encodes the tumour suppressor p53, are found in 50% of human cancers, and increased levels of its negative regulators MDM2 and MDM4 (also known as MDMX) downregulate p53 function in many of the rest. Understanding p53 regulation remains a crucial goal to design broadly applicable anticancer strategies based on this pathway. This Review of in vitro studies, human tumour data and recent mouse models shows that p53 post-translational modifications have modulatory roles, and MDM2 and MDM4 have more profound roles for regulating p53. Importantly, MDM4 emerges as an independent target for drug development, as its inactivation is crucial for full p53 activation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc2012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biochemical analysis indicates that DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and Ser20 does not completely prevent Mdm2 binding, and mutation at these phosphorylation sites does not abrogate p53 stabilization after DNA damage in vivo.

    “However, biochemical analysis indicates that these phosphorylation events do not completely prevent Mdm2 binding, and mutation at these phosphorylation sites does not abrogate p53 stabilization after DNA damage in vivo (see [69] for review).”

    From The p53 orchestra: Mdm2 and Mdmx set the tone (2010) · cites this paper as [69]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 168 · Cited by 1,286

Authors
Toledo, F., & Wahl, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Corresponding author
  • Toledo, Franck
  • Wahl, Geoffrey M.
Venue
Nature reviews. Cancer
Published
2006-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
909-923
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2025476423
Cited by
1,286
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 106
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
p53 regulation, TP53 mutation, MDM2, MDM4, MDMX, post-translational modification, tumour suppressor, anticancer drug targets, mouse tumor model
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Experimental, Nuclear Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cell Cycle Proteins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Protein Modification, Translational, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review