Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome
Open accessAbstract
Reduced oxygen levels (hypoxia) is one of the most important factors influencing clinical outcome after radiotherapy. This is primarily because hypoxic cells are resistant to radiation treatment; hence, the greater the number of clonogenic cancer stem cells that exist under hypoxia, the lower the local tumour control. Reduced local control will influence overall survival, as may the hypoxic conditions by increasing malignant progression; however, to fight hypoxia, we should first be able to see it. We need noninvasive approaches that can accurately and reliably image hypoxia in tumours, especially using techniques that are routinely available in the clinic, such as PET, MRI and CT. All these imaging methods are already under clinical evaluation in this context. Such data should allow us to identify those patients on an individual basis who have hypoxic tumours and, thus, at the very least should receive some form of hypoxic modifier in conjunction with radiotherapy. Alternatively, the radiation dose could be either increased to the whole tumour or, if the imaging is accurate enough, only to the hypoxic subvolumes. The aim of this Review is to critically assess the potential use of imaging to help improve clinical outcome to radiotherapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Under hypoxic conditions, the radiation dose would need to be increased two- or threefold to achieve the same level of damage.
“Therefore, under hypoxic conditions, the radiation dose would need to be increased two‐ or threefold to achieve the same level of damage. 342”
From Hypoxia signaling in cancer: Implications for therapeutic interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [342]
Under hypoxia or in the presence of reducing substances, free radicals chemically return to their original form, and the damage is repaired.
“However, if this process occurs under hypoxia or in the presence of reducing substances, the free radicals chemically return to their original form, and the damage is repaired (Figure 5).”
From Hypoxia signaling in cancer: Implications for therapeutic interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [342]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 614
- Authors
- Horsman, M. R., Mortensen, L. S., Petersen, J. B., Busk, M., & Overgaard, J.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Overgaard, Jens
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2012-11-13
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 674-687
- ISSN
- 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4782
- OpenAlex
- W2044245267
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- tumor hypoxia, hypoxia imaging, radiotherapy, radioresistance (biology), local tumor control, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, dose escalation, non-invasive imaging, cancer stem cells, malignant progression
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Hypoxia, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Neoplasms, Prognosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review