Cited by 158PARP inhibition in cancer therapyBRCA gene mutations in cancerOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Delivering widespread BRCA testing and PARP inhibition to patients with ovarian cancer

George, Angela, Kaye, Stan, Banerjee, Susana·2017·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

The treatment of patients with ovarian cancer is rapidly changing following the success of poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in clinical trials. Olaparib is the first PARP inhibitor to be approved by the EMA and FDA for BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer. Germ line BRCA mutation status is now established as a predictive biomarker of potential benefit from treatment with a PARP inhibitor; therefore, knowledge of the BRCA status of an individual patient with ovarian cancer is essential, in order to guide treatment decisions. BRCA testing was previously offered only to women with a family or personal history of breast and/or ovarian cancer; however, almost 20% of women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer are now recognized to harbour a germ line BRCA mutation, and of these, >40% might not have a family history of cancer and would not have received BRCA testing. A strategy to enable more widespread implementation of BRCA testing in routine care is, therefore, necessary. In this Review, we summarize data from key clinical trials of PARP inhibitors and discuss how to integrate these agents into the current treatment landscape of ovarian cancer. The validity of germ line BRCA testing and other promising biomarkers of homologous-recombination deficiency will also be discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.191

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hereditary cancers provide examples where genetic testing informs targeted therapy, such as BRCA1/BRCA2 testing for PARP inhibitor treatment.

    “Hereditary cancers provide multiple examples, such as the use of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing to inform PARP inhibitor treatment in patients with cancer154.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [154]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 99 · Cited by 158

Authors
George, A., Kaye, S., & Banerjee, S.
Affiliations
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Banerjee, Susana
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2016-12-13
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
284-296
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W2561042858
Cited by
158
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
ovarian cancer, BRCA mutation testing, PARP inhibitors, olaparib, high-grade serous ovarian cancer, homologous recombination deficiency, predictive biomarkers, routine cancer care, treatment decision-making
MeSH terms
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Models, Genetic, Ovarian Neoplasms, Germ-Line Mutation, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review