Cited by 920Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 251 of the 252 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automating drug discovery

Schneider, Gisbert·2018·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

Small-molecule drug discovery can be viewed as a challenging multidimensional problem in which various characteristics of compounds - including efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety - need to be optimized in parallel to provide drug candidates. Recent advances in areas such as microfluidics-assisted chemical synthesis and biological testing, as well as artificial intelligence systems that improve a design hypothesis through feedback analysis, are now providing a basis for the introduction of greater automation into aspects of this process. This could potentially accelerate time frames for compound discovery and optimization and enable more effective searches of chemical space. However, such approaches also raise considerable conceptual, technical and organizational challenges, as well as scepticism about the current hype around them. This article aims to identify the approaches and technologies that could be implemented robustly by medicinal chemists in the near future and to critically analyse the opportunities and challenges for their more widespread application.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd.2017.232

Cites

251 of 251 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 252 references

1 of the 252 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sparkes, A. et al. Towards robot scientists for autonomous scientific discovery. Autom. Exp. 2, 1 (2010). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 920

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, G.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Gisbert
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2017-12-15
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
97-113
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2775714759
Cited by
910
References
252
Citations by year
2026: 167 · 2025: 154 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • AstraZeneca
  • OPO-Stiftung
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 675555, 676434)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (157190, 159737)
  • Horizon 2020 (676434)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
small molecule drug discovery, artificial intelligence in drug design, compound optimization, chemical space exploration, medicinal chemistry, pharmacokinetics, drug safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Drug Industry, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review