The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physicochemical parameters
Open accessAbstract
A common underlying assumption in current drug discovery strategies is that compounds with higher in vitro potency at their target(s) have greater potential to translate into successful, low-dose therapeutics. This has led to the development of screening cascades with in vitro potency embedded as an early filter. However, this approach is beginning to be questioned, given the bias in physicochemical properties that it can introduce early in lead generation and optimization, which is due to the often diametrically opposed relationship between physicochemical parameters associated with high in vitro potency and those associated with desirable absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) characteristics. Here, we describe analyses that probe these issues further using the ChEMBL database, which includes more than 500,000 drug discovery and marketed oral drug compounds. Key findings include: first, that oral drugs seldom possess nanomolar potency (50 nM on average); second, that many oral drugs have considerable off-target activity; and third, that in vitro potency does not correlate strongly with the therapeutic dose. These findings suggest that the perceived benefit of high in vitro potency may be negated by poorer ADMET properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (1997) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(96)00423-1 · Cited by 11,385
Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.118 · Cited by 4,622
Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?
Kola, I., & Landis, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1470 · Cited by 4,167
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566
How many drug targets are there?
Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B., & Hopkins, A. L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2199 · Cited by 3,505
Self-citationGoh, K.-I., Cusick, M. E., Valle, D., Childs, B., Vidal, M., & Barabási, A.-L. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701361104 · Cited by 3,242
The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry
Leeson, P. D., & Springthorpe, B. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2445 · Cited by 2,403
Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection
Hopkins, A. L., Groom, C. R., & Alex, A. (2004) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(04)03069-7 · Cited by 1,846
Yıldırım, M. A., Goh, K.-I., Cusick, M. E., Barabási, A.-L., & Vidal, M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1338 · Cited by 1,708
Cited by
A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets
Santos, R., Ursu, O., Gaulton, A., Bento, A. P., Donadi, R. S., Bologa, C. G., Karlsson, A., Al-Lazikani, B., Hersey, A., Oprea, T. I., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.230 · Cited by 2,427
Self-citationDiagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency
Scannell, J. W., Blanckley, A., Boldon, H., & Warrington, B. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3681 · Cited by 1,981
How were new medicines discovered?
Swinney, D. C., & Anthony, J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3480 · Cited by 1,812
An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies
Waring, M. J., Arrowsmith, J., Leach, A. R., Leeson, P. D., Mandrell, S., Owen, R. M., Pairaudeau, G., Pennie, W. D., Pickett, S. D., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4609 · Cited by 1,450
The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L., Keserü, G. M., Leeson, P. D., Rees, D. C., & Reynolds, C. H. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4163 · Cited by 1,181
Metadata
- Authors
- Gleeson, M. P., Hersey, A., Montanari, D., & Overington, J.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-208
- ISSN
- 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1784
- OpenAlex
- W2083354933
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physicochemical parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrd3367
- The paper
- Gleeson, M. P., Hersey, A., Montanari, D., & Overington, J. (2011). Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physicochemical parameters. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
