Emerging paradigms in GPCR allostery: implications for drug discovery
Abstract
Allosteric ligands bind to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs; also known as seven-transmembrane receptors) at sites that are distinct from the sites to which endogenous ligands bind. The existence of allosteric ligands has enriched the ways in which the functions of GPCRs can be manipulated for potential therapeutic benefit, yet the complexity of their actions provides both challenges and opportunities for drug screening and development. Converging avenues of research in areas such as biased signalling by allosteric ligands and the mechanisms by which allosteric ligands modulate the effects of diverse endogenous ligands have provided new insights into how interactions between allosteric ligands and GPCRs could be exploited for drug discovery. These new findings have the potential to alter how screening for allosteric drugs is performed and may increase the chances of success in the development of allosteric modulators as clinical lead compounds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Allosteric modulators can be classified into PAMs, NAMs, and SAMs based on effects on receptor.
“According to their effects on the receptor, allosteric modulators can be classified into three categories: positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), which improve the action of orthosteric effectors but have no intrinsic activity; negative allosteric modulators (NAMs), which inhibit the function of orthosteric effectors; and silent allosteric modulators (SAMs), also known as neutral allosteric modul”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [249]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 122 · Cited by 498
- Authors
- Wootten, D., Christopoulos, A., & Sexton, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sexton, Patrick M.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 630-644
- ISSN
- 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1784
- OpenAlex
- W1966874741
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- G protein-coupled receptors, allosteric ligands, allosteric modulation, biased signalling, allosteric modulators, drug discovery
- MeSH terms
- Allosteric Regulation, Allosteric Site, Animals, Humans, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Species Specificity, Signal Transduction, Drugs, Investigational, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Drug Discovery, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Molecular Targeted Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review