22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Open accessAbstract
22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common chromosomal microdeletion disorder, estimated to result mainly from de novo non-homologous meiotic recombination events occurring in approximately 1 in every 1,000 fetuses. The first description in the English language of the constellation of findings now known to be due to this chromosomal difference was made in the 1960s in children with DiGeorge syndrome, who presented with the clinical triad of immunodeficiency, hypoparathyroidism and congenital heart disease. The syndrome is now known to have a heterogeneous presentation that includes multiple additional congenital anomalies and later-onset conditions, such as palatal, gastrointestinal and renal abnormalities, autoimmune disease, variable cognitive delays, behavioural phenotypes and psychiatric illness - all far extending the original description of DiGeorge syndrome. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach involving paediatrics, general medicine, surgery, psychiatry, psychology, interventional therapies (physical, occupational, speech, language and behavioural) and genetic counselling. Although common, lack of recognition of the condition and/or lack of familiarity with genetic testing methods, together with the wide variability of clinical presentation, delays diagnosis. Early diagnosis, preferably prenatally or neonatally, could improve outcomes, thus stressing the importance of universal screening. Equally important, 22q11.2DS has become a model for understanding rare and frequent congenital anomalies, medical conditions, psychiatric and developmental disorders, and may provide a platform to better understand these disorders while affording opportunities for translational strategies across the lifespan for both patients with 22q11.2DS and those with these associated features in the general population.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CNVs, both deletions and duplications, have been implicated in SZ.
“CNVs, both deletions and duplications, have been implicated in SZ [132-134]”
From Neural circuits regulating prosocial behaviors (2023) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 430 · Cited by 2,236
- Authors
- McDonald-McGinn, D. M., Sullivan, K. E., Marino, B., Philip, N., Swillen, A., Vorstman, J. A. S., Zackai, E. H., Emanuel, B. S., Vermeesch, J. R., Morrow, B. E., Scambler, P. J., & Bassett, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Inserm (FR)
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- University College London (GB)
- University Health Network (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Disease Primers
- Published
- 2015-11-19
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15071-15071
- ISSN
- 2056-676X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4900471
- OpenAlex
- W2253685848
- Cited by
- 2,236
- References
- 430
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 153 · 2012: 132
- FWCI
- 12.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Disease Primers (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Immune Deficiency Foundation
- Baxalta
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- National Institutes of Health (HD070454)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP #111238, MOP #97800, 111238, 97800, 70454_1)
- National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH101723, U01MH101719, U01MH087636, U01MH101724, U01MH101720, U01MH101722)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD070454)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, chromosomal microdeletion, immunodeficiency, hypoparathyroidism, congenital heart disease, congenital malformations, autoimmune disease, mental illness, cognitive delay, behavioral phenotypes, multidisciplinary management, prenatal screening, newborn screening, genetic counseling
- MeSH terms
- Abnormalities, Multiple, Child, DiGeorge Syndrome, Genetic Testing, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Patient Care Team
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review