Cited by 357Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPregnancy-related medical research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 251 of the 252 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Postpartum psychiatric disorders

Open access

Abstract

Pregnancy is a complex and vulnerable period that presents a number of challenges to women, including the development of postpartum psychiatric disorders (PPDs). These disorders can include postpartum depression and anxiety, which are relatively common, and the rare but more severe postpartum psychosis. In addition, other PPDs can include obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and eating disorders. The aetiology of PPDs is a complex interaction of psychological, social and biological factors, in addition to genetic and environmental factors. The goals of treating postpartum mental illness are reducing maternal symptoms and supporting maternal-child and family functioning. Women and their families should receive psychoeducation about the illness, including evidence-based discussions about the risks and benefits of each treatment option. Developing effective strategies in global settings that allow the delivery of targeted therapies to women with different clinical phenotypes and severities of PPDs is essential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrdp.2018.22

Cites

251 of 251 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 252 references

1 of the 252 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gaynes, B. N. et al. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. (Summ.) 119, 1–8 (2005).
  2. Munk-Olsen, T., Laursen, T. M., Pedersen, C. B., Mors, O. & Mortensen, P. B. New parents and mental disorders. A population-based register study. JAMA 296, 2582–2589 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. & Brown, G. K. Manual for the BDI-II (The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX, 1996).
  4. Milgrom, J. & Gemmill, A. W. in Applied Topics in Heallth Psychology (eds Caltabiano, M. & Ricciardelli, L. ) 212–227 (Wiley, Chichester, 2013).
  5. O’Connor, E., Rossom, R. C., Henninger, M., Groom, H. C. & Burda, B. U. Primary care screening for and treatment of depression in pregnant and postpartumwomen evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA 315, 388–406 (2016). This paper documents the overwhelming and sufficient evidence and need for routine screening of all women in the perinatal period. · DOI · Paper page
  6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Press, Arlington, VA, 2013). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Meltzer-Brody, S., Howard, L. M., Bergink, V., Vigod, S., Jones, I., Munk-Olsen, T., Honikman, S., & Milgrom, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Meltzer-Brody, Samantha
Venue
Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Published
2018-04-26
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
18022-18022
ISSN
2056-676X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802792529
Cited by
357
References
252
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Disease Primers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-RP-R3-12-011)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R248‐2017‐2003)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L010305/1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH104468)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
postpartum mental disorders, postpartum depression, postpartum anxiety, postpartum psychosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, eating disorders, etiology, maternal mental health, psychoeducation, treatment options, global mental health
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mass Screening, Mothers, Quality of Life, Comorbidity, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review