AGE restriction in diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift
Open accessAbstract
Persistently elevated oxidative stress and inflammation precede or occur during the development of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and precipitate devastating complications. Given the rapidly increasing incidence of diabetes mellitus and obesity in the space of a few decades, new genetic mutations are unlikely to be the cause, instead pointing to environmental initiators. A hallmark of contemporary culture is a preference for thermally processed foods, replete with pro-oxidant advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs). These molecules are appetite-increasing and, thus, efficient enhancers of overnutrition (which promotes obesity) and oxidant overload (which promotes inflammation). Studies of genetic and nongenetic animal models of diabetes mellitus suggest that suppression of host defenses, under sustained pressure from food-derived AGEs, may potentially shift homeostasis towards a higher basal level of oxidative stress, inflammation and injury of both insulin-producing and insulin-responsive cells. This sequence promotes both types of diabetes mellitus. Reducing basal oxidative stress by AGE restriction in mice, without energy or nutrient change, reinstates host defenses, alleviates inflammation, prevents diabetes mellitus, vascular and renal complications and extends normal lifespan. Studies in healthy humans and in those with diabetes mellitus show that consumption of high amounts of food-related AGEs is a determinant of insulin resistance and inflammation and that AGE restriction improves both. This Review focuses on AGEs as novel initiators of oxidative stress that precedes, rather than results from, diabetes mellitus. Therapeutic gains from AGE restriction constitute a paradigm shift.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Orally absorbed advanced glycation and lipoxidation end-products formed during food processing or when foods are cooked at high temperatures and low humidity are appetite increasing and linked to overnutrition, obesity, and inflammation.
“orally absorbed advanced glycation and lipoxidation end-products that are formed during the processing of foods or when foods are cooked at high temperatures and in low-humidity conditions are appetite increasing and are linked to overnutrition and hence obesity and inflammation132.”
From Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span (2019) · cites this paper as [132]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 178 · Cited by 277
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [70]Tessier FJ Niquet C The metabolic, nutritional and toxicological consequences of ingested dietary Maillard reaction products: a literature review [French] J Soc Biol 201 199 207 2007 17978754
- [173]Uribarri J Advanced glycation end products in foods and a practical guide to their reduction in the diet J Am Diet Assoc 110 911 916 2009 20497781 PMC3704564
- Authors
- Vlassara, H., & Striker, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vlassara, Helen
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Endocrinology
- Published
- 2011-05-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 526-539
- ISSN
- 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5037
- PMC
- PMC3708644
- OpenAlex
- W2122392577
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 178
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK091231, R01DK091231)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000071, RR‑00071)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Potato Plant Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Keywords
- advanced glycation end products, age limits, diabetes mellitus, oxidative stress, inflammation, insulin resistance, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, obesity, overnutrition, thermally processed foods, dietary AGEs, diabetes prevention, diabetes complications, lifespan extension, host defense
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Glycation End Products, Advanced, Oxidative Stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review