Risks and benefits of testosterone therapy in older men
Abstract
In young men (defined as age<50 years) with classic hypogonadism caused by known diseases of the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes, testosterone replacement therapy induces a number of beneficial effects, for example, the development of secondary sex characteristics, improvement and maintenance of sexual function, and increases in skeletal muscle mass and BMD. Moreover, testosterone treatment in this patient population is associated with a low frequency of adverse events. Circulating testosterone levels decline progressively with age, starting in the second and third decade of life, owing to defects at all levels of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis. In cohort studies, testosterone levels are associated weakly but consistently with muscle mass, strength, physical function, anaemia, BMD and bone quality, visceral adiposity, and with the risk of diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, falls, fractures and mortality. However, the clinical benefits and long-term risks of testosterone therapy--especially prostate-related and cardiovascular-related adverse events--have not been adequately assessed in large, randomized clinical trials involving older men (defined as age>65 years) with androgen deficiency. Therefore, a general policy of testosterone replacement in all older men with age-related decline in testosterone levels is not justified.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of patients diagnosed and treated for hypogonadism over the past decade has increased significantly, with an exponential rise in prescribed testosterone in many developed countries.
“the number of patients diagnosed and treated for hypogonadism over the past decade has increased significantly, with an exponential rise in prescribed T in many developed countries.”
From Challenges in Testosterone Measurement, Data Interpretation, and Methodological Appraisal of Interventional Trials (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 182 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Spitzer, M., Huang, G., Basaria, S., Travison, T. G., & Bhasin, S.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bhasin, Shalender
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Endocrinology
- Published
- 2013-04-16
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 414-424
- ISSN
- 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5037
- OpenAlex
- W1997103278
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 182
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- testosterone replacement therapy, androgen deficiency, older men, age-related testosterone decline, hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis, cardiovascular risk, bone mineral density, muscle mass, sexual function, diabetes mellitus, falls and fractures, mortality
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, Male, Testosterone, Risk Assessment, Hormone Replacement Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review