The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice
Open accessAbstract
For several years, large funding bodies have made data sharing a requirement of support for all projects. Although such open access policies have benefited the progress of science, it is worth considering how they are affecting scientific practice. Funding bodies have recently introduced a requirement that data sharing must be a consideration of all funding applications in genomics. As with all new developments this condition has had an impact on scientific practice, particularly in the area of publishing and in the conduct of research. We discuss the challenges that must be addressed if the full benefits of data sharing, as envisaged by funders, are to be realized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4463 · Cited by 7,046
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
Baber, Z., Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076669 · Cited by 4,406
The New Production of Knowledge
Gibbons, M. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,405
Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
McCarthy, M. I., Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., Goldstein, D. B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2344 · Cited by 2,891
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.
Mossman, K. (2008) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-42a · Cited by 2,684
Homer, N., Szelinger, S., Redman, M., Duggan, D., Tembe, W., Muehling, J., Pearson, J. V., Stephan, D. A., Nelson, S. F., & Craig, D. W. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167 · Cited by 1,221
Real Science: What it Is and What it Means
Ziman, J. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511541391 · Cited by 760
Real science what it is, and what it means
Ziman, J. M. (2000) · Cited by 759
Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: Evidence From a National Survey
Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.4.473 · Cited by 489
Cited by
Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks
Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., & Melham, K. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.71 · Cited by 780
Self-citationRoutes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy
Erlich, Y., & Narayanan, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3723 · Cited by 458
Using Genomics to Track Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Hendriksen, R. S., Bortolaia, V., Tate, H., Tyson, G. H., Aarestrup, F. M., & McDermott, P. F. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00242 · Cited by 425
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Improving Diagnostic Accuracy and Achieving Precision Medicine
Castaneda, C., Nalley, K., Mannion, C., Bhattacharyya, P., Blake, P., Pecora, A., Goy, A., & Suh, K. S. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s13336-015-0019-3 · Cited by 408
Diversity and inclusion in genomic research: why the uneven progress?
Bentley, A. R., Callier, S., & Rotimi, C. N. (2017) · Journal of Community Genetics · doi:10.1007/s12687-017-0316-6 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaye, J., Heeney, C., Hawkins, N., de Vries, J., & Boddington, P.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 331-335
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- OpenAlex
- W2121627353
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrg2573
- The paper
- Kaye, J., Heeney, C., Hawkins, N., de Vries, J., & Boddington, P. (2009). Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice. Nature Reviews Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
