Cited by 1,316Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesDNA Repair MechanismsGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Mechanisms of change in gene copy number

Open access
Hastings, P. J., Lupski, James R., Rosenberg, Susan M., Ira, Grzegorz·2009·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Deletions and duplications of chromosomal segments (copy number variants, CNVs) are a major source of variation between individual humans and are an underlying factor in human evolution and in many diseases, including mental illness, developmental disorders and cancer. CNVs form at a faster rate than other types of mutation, and seem to do so by similar mechanisms in bacteria, yeast and humans. Here we review current models of the mechanisms that cause copy number variation. Non-homologous end-joining mechanisms are well known, but recent models focus on perturbation of DNA replication and replication of non-contiguous DNA segments. For example, cellular stress might induce repair of broken replication forks to switch from high-fidelity homologous recombination to non-homologous repair, thus promoting copy number change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg2593

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Locus-specific studies suggest that diverse mechanisms form structural variants de novo, with some mechanisms involving complex rearrangements and multiple chromosomal breakpoints.

    “locus-specific studies suggest that diverse mechanisms may form SVs de novo, with some mechanisms involving complex rearrangements resulting in multiple chromosomal breakpoints8,9.”
  • DNA rearrangement in the absence of homology, namely microhomology-mediated break-induced replication, has been implicated in recurrent structural-variant formation.

    “DNA rearrangement in the absence of homology, i.e., MMBIR, has been implicated in recurrent SV formation8,45.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 162 · Cited by 1,316

Authors
Hastings, P. J., Lupski, J. R., Rosenberg, S. M., & Ira, G.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Hastings, P. J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2009-08
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
551-564
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2034979835
Cited by
1,316
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 85
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA85777, R01CA085777)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM80600, R01GM53158, R01GM064022, R01GM053158, R01-GM64022, R01GM080600)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS058529, R01 NS59529, R21NS059529)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000188)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
copy number variation, non-homologous end joining, replication fork repair, chromosomal deletion, chromosomal duplication, DNA replication, homologous recombination, cellular stress, genome evolution, human disease
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Genetic, Recombination, Genetic, Gene Dosage, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review