The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research
Open accessAbstract
Advances in computing technology and bioinformatics mean that medical research is increasingly characterized by large international consortia of researchers that are reliant on large data sets and biobanks. These trends raise a number of challenges for obtaining consent, protecting participant privacy concerns and maintaining public trust. Participant-centred initiatives (PCIs) use social media technologies to address these immediate concerns, but they also provide the basis for long-term interactive partnerships. Here, we give an overview of this rapidly moving field by providing an analysis of the different PCI approaches, as well as the benefits and challenges of implementing PCIs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It was within the EnCoRe project that the notion of dynamic consent was first coined by Professor Kaye and her team [97] as a way to provide dynamic and granular options for revocation in system design [96].”
From Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions (2018) · cites this paper as [97]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walker, J., Pan, E., Johnston, D., Adler-Milstein, J., Bates, D. W., & Middleton, B. (2005) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w5.10 · Cited by 811
Do, C. B., Tung, J. Y., Dorfman, E., Kiefer, A. K., Drabant, E. M., Francke, U., Mountain, J. L., Goldman, S. M., Tanner, C. M., Langston, J. W., et al. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002141 · Cited by 515
Web-Based, Participant-Driven Studies Yield Novel Genetic Associations for Common Traits
Eriksson, N., Macpherson, J. M., Tung, J. Y., Hon, L., Naughton, B., Saxonov, S., Avey, L., Wojcicki, A., Pe’er, I., & Mountain, J. L. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000993 · Cited by 483
Wicks, P., Vaughan, T. E., Massagli, M. P., & Heywood, J. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1837 · Cited by 362
Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing
McGuire, A. L., Caulfield, T., & Cho, M. K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2302 · Cited by 267
The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research
Kaye, J. (2012) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454 · Cited by 240
Self-citationGenomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants
Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Bares, J. M., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B., & Burke, W. (2010) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e3181e38f9e · Cited by 210
Self-citationCarroll, J. G. (2010) · Quality Management in Health Care · doi:10.1097/qmh.0b013e3181d1391c · Cited by 152
Assessing the Privacy Risks of Data Sharing in Genomics
Heeney, C., Hawkins, N., de Vries, J., Boddington, P., & Kaye, J. S. (2010) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000294150 · Cited by 125
Self-citationMahoney, C. D., Berard-Collins, C., Coleman, R., Amaral, J. F., & Cotter, C. M. (2007) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp060617 · Cited by 124
From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance
Kaye, J. S. (2011) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0 · Cited by 121
Self-citationBourgeois, F. C., Taylor, P. L., Emans, S. J., Nigrin, D. J., & Mandl, K. D. (2008) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2865 · Cited by 101
Self-citationPower to the People : Participant Ownership of Clinical Trial Data
Terry, S. F., & Terry, P. F. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001857 · Cited by 55
Self-citationFeied, C. F., Handler, J. A., Stafford‐Smith, M., Gillam, M. P., Kanhouwa, M., Rothenhaus, T. C., Conover, K., & Shannon, T. (2004) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.010 · Cited by 50
Using NHS Patient Data for Research Without Consent
Brown, I., Brown, L., & Korff, D. (2010) · Law Innovation and Technology · doi:10.5235/175799610794046186 · Cited by 49
Patients providing the answers: narrowing the gap in data quality for emergency care
Porter, S. C., Forbes, P., Manzi, S. F., & Kalish, L. A. (2010) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.032540 · Cited by 24
Electronic Consent Channels: Preserving Patient Privacy Without Handcuffing Researchers
Shelton, R. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002037 · Cited by 24
Consenting in Population Genomics as an Open Communication Process
Mascalzoni, D., Hicks, A. A., & Pramstaller, P. P. (2009) · Studies in Ethics Law and Technology · doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1085 · Cited by 16
Self-citationData Protection and Sample Management in Biobanking - A legal dichotomy
den Bäumen, T. S. I., Paci, D., & Ibarreta, D. (2010) · Genomics Society and Policy · doi:10.1186/1746-5354-6-1-33 · Cited by 15
Benefits Of Interoperability: A Closer Look At The Estimates
Baker, L. C. (2005) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w5.22 · Cited by 14
WHO lists "best buys" for cutting deaths from non-communicable disease
Zarocostas, J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d2648 · Cited by 14
The Benefits of Sharing Clinical Information
Teich, J. M. (1998) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70318-x · Cited by 14
The value of healthcare information exchange and interoperability in New York state.
Hook, J. M., Pan, E., Adler‐Milstein, J., Bu, D., & Walker, J. (2006) · PubMed Central · Cited by 11
BMA warns against letting patients have access to their electronic records
Cross, M. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d206 · Cited by 11
NHS Connecting for Health and the National Programme for Information Technology
Khong, S., Currie, I., & Eccles, S. (2008) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1576/toag.10.1.027.27374 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Wagstaff, A. International biobanking regulations: the promise and the pitfalls. Cancer World 42, 23–29 (2011).
- Al-Ubaydli, M. A. & Smith, R. The BMA has adopted an old fashioned, paternalistic, and misguided policy by warning against patients having access to their electronic records. BMJ Rapid Response [online] , (2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: Precision Medicine for Psychiatry
Insel, T. R. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14020138 · Cited by 1,472
Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks
Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., & Melham, K. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.71 · Cited by 780
Self-citationThe ethics of big data: current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts
Mittelstadt, B. D., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2 · Cited by 714
Using electronic health records for population health research: a review of methods and applications
Casey, J. A., Schwartz, B. S., Stewart, W. F., & Adler, N. E. (2016) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021353 · Cited by 590
Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy
Erlich, Y., & Narayanan, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3723 · Cited by 487
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaye, J., Curren, L., Anderson, N., Edwards, K., Fullerton, S. M., Kanellopoulou, N., Lund, D., MacArthur, D. G., Mascalzoni, D., Shepherd, J., Taylor, P. L., Terry, S. F., & Winter, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Washington (US)
- HW Communications (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Harvard University (US)
- Eurac Research (IT)
- Churchill Hospital (GB)
- Genetic Alliance (US)
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kaye, Jane
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2012-04-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 371-376
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- PMC
- PMC3806497
- OpenAlex
- W2027139930
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (096599/2/11/Z, 096599)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G002541/1)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025014)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- social media, research participant engagement, research governance, participant privacy, public trust in research, biobanks, research consortium
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Informed Consent, Privacy, Computational Biology, Biomedical Research, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
