IBD—what role do Proteobacteria play?
Abstract
The gastrointestinal microbiota has come to the fore in the search for the causes of IBD. This shift has largely been driven by the finding of genetic polymorphisms involved in gastrointestinal innate immunity (particularly polymorphisms in NOD2 and genes involved in autophagy) and alterations in the composition of the microbiota that might result in inflammation (so-called dysbiosis). Microbial diversity studies have continually demonstrated an expansion of the Proteobacteria phylum in patients with IBD. Individual Proteobacteria, in particular (adherent-invasive) Escherichia coli, Campylobacter concisus and enterohepatic Helicobacter, have all been associated with the pathogenesis of IBD. In this Review, we comprehensively describe the various associations of Proteobacteria and IBD. We also examine the importance of pattern recognition in the extracellular innate immune response of the host with particular reference to Proteobacteria, and postulate that Proteobacteria with adherent and invasive properties might exploit host defenses, drive proinflammatory change, alter the intestinal microbiota in favor of dysbiosis and ultimately lead to the development of IBD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The expansion of Proteobacteria could facilitate a mucosal immune response in genetically predisposed individuals, leading to the development and continuation of chronic intestinal inflammation.
“Moreover, the expansion of Proteobacteria could facilitate a mucosal immune response in genetically predisposed individuals, leading to the development and continuation of chronic intestinal inflammation[133,142,143].”
From Proton pump inhibitors and dysbiosis: current knowledge and aspects to be clarified (2019) · cites this paper as [133]
Proteobacteria are intimately tied to a pro-inflammatory state.
“This phyla has been shown to be intimately tied to a pro-inflammatory state.11,60,61”
From Using Corticosteroids to Reshape the Gut Microbiome: Implications for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (2015) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 156 · Cited by 810
- Authors
- Mukhopadhya, I., Hansen, R., El-Omar, E. M., & Hold, G. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hold, Georgina L.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Published
- 2012-02-21
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 219-230
- ISSN
- 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5053
- OpenAlex
- W1552685796
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 156
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
- Keywords
- inflammatory bowel disease, Proteobacteria, gut microbiota, dysbiosis, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter concisus, Helicobacter, NOD2, autophagy, innate immunity, pattern recognition receptors, intestinal inflammation, microbial pathogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Proteobacteria, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review