Cited by 4,367Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsCellular Mechanics and InteractionsTGF-β signaling in diseases

Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease

Open access
Bonnans, Caroline, Chou, Jonathan, Werb, Zena·2014·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a highly dynamic structure that is present in all tissues and continuously undergoes controlled remodelling. This process involves quantitative and qualitative changes in the ECM, mediated by specific enzymes that are responsible for ECM degradation, such as metalloproteinases. The ECM interacts with cells to regulate diverse functions, including proliferation, migration and differentiation. ECM remodelling is crucial for regulating the morphogenesis of the intestine and lungs, as well as of the mammary and submandibular glands. Dysregulation of ECM composition, structure, stiffness and abundance contributes to several pathological conditions, such as fibrosis and invasive cancer. A better understanding of how the ECM regulates organ structure and function and of how ECM remodelling affects disease progression will contribute to the development of new therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrm3904

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deregulated ECM supports epithelial cellular transformation and hyperplasia.

    “In addition, deregulated ECM supports epithelial cellular transformation and hyperplasia [19].”

    From 3D In Vitro Model (R)evolution: Unveiling Tumor–Stroma Interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    Box 1 says ECM signals regulate epithelial-cell proliferation and that dysregulated remodelling can exacerbate disease. The section ‘ECM stiffness and remodelling in cancer progression’ says ECM can promote tumour progression and links MMP1 expression to the risk that atypical ductal hyperplasia becomes cancer. It does not establish that deregulated ECM causes or supports epithelial-cell transformation or hyperplasia itself; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ECM stiffness (desmoplasia), alongside rapid cancer cell proliferation and poor blood vessel network, contributes to cellular hypoxia in epithelial-derived tumors.

    “For example, ECM stiffness ( desmoplasia ), alongside rapid cancer cell proliferation and the establishment of a poor blood vessel network, contributes to cellular hypoxia in epithelial-derived tumors [19,20].”

    From 3D In Vitro Model (R)evolution: Unveiling Tumor–Stroma Interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    Box 3 (page unavailable) says ECM stiffening occurs in cancer and contributes to malignant progression. The section “The ECM promotes angiogenesis” (page unavailable) describes ECM effects on tumour blood vessels, but neither passage says that stiffness, rapid proliferation and a poor vessel network cause cellular hypoxia in epithelial-derived tumours. A search for hypoxia found no passage establishing that causal claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MMPs are essential for ECM degradation and tumor cell invasion, and contribute to formation of metastatic sites and angiogenesis support by the TME.

    “Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are essential for ECM degradation and tumor cell invasion, and also contribute to the formation of metastatic sites and angiogenesis support by the TME [19,22].”

    From 3D In Vitro Model (R)evolution: Unveiling Tumor–Stroma Interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Matrix metalloproteinases section calls MMPs the main enzymes of ECM degradation. Box 3 describes MMP9-mediated basement-membrane breakdown at future metastatic sites, and Abnormal release of growth factors during pathogenesis describes MMP9 releasing VEGF during an angiogenic switch. The copy discusses MMP-regulated invasion in mammary-gland development, but does not establish that MMPs are essential for tumour-cell invasion. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dynamic changes in ECM components regulate cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, differentiation, cytoskeletal organization, and cell signaling.

    “Dynamic changes in ECM components regulate cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, differentiation, cytoskeletal organization, and cell signaling [4,19].”

    From 3D In Vitro Model (R)evolution: Unveiling Tumor–Stroma Interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    Box 1 says ECM components transmit signals regulating adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation, and describes ECM remodelling. It also describes signalling molecules released by the ECM. The passages found do not establish that dynamic changes in ECM components regulate cytoskeletal organization; Box 1 mentions a cytoskeletal connection but not that effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 163 · Cited by 4,367

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]18. Kruse MN, et al. Human meprin α and β homooligomers: cleavage of basement membrane proteins and sensitivity to metalloprotease inhibitors. Biochem J. 2004; 378:383-389. [PubMed: 14594449]

Authors
Bonnans, C., Chou, J., & Werb, Z.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Werb, Zena
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2014-11-21
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
786-801
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W1965498876
Cited by
4,367
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 356 · 2025: 420 · 2024: 448 · 2023: 457 · 2022: 491 · 2021: 531 · 2020: 500 · 2019: 353 · 2018: 316 · 2017: 245 · 2016: 157 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (BC122990)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA138818, CA 057621, CA138818, R01CA057621)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
extracellular matrix remodeling, matrix metalloproteinases, extracellular matrix degradation, organ morphogenesis, intestinal morphogenesis, lung morphogenesis, mammary gland development, fibrosis, invasive cancer, extracellular matrix stiffness
MeSH terms
Animals, Epithelial Cells, Extracellular Matrix, Fibrosis, Humans, Morphogenesis, Neoplasms, Endopeptidases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review