Cited by 170Malaria Research and ControlBiosensors and Analytical DetectionBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests: malaria

Bell, David, Peeling, Rosanna W.·2006·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrmicro1524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 170

Authors
Bell, D., & Peeling, R. W.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific (PH)
  • World Bank (US)
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2006-09
Volume
4
Issue
S9
Pages
S34-S38
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W2044720125
Cited by
170
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
rapid diagnostic tests, malaria, malaria diagnosis, diagnostic test evaluation, Plasmodium falciparum
MeSH terms
Antigens, Protozoan, Humans, Immunologic Tests, Malaria, Microscopy, Quality Control, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review