Cited by 856Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis TechniquesNeural dynamics and brain function

Communication dynamics in complex brain networks

Avena-Koenigsberger, Andrea, Misic, Bratislav, Sporns, Olaf·2018·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuronal signalling and communication underpin virtually all aspects of brain activity and function. Network science approaches to modelling and analysing the dynamics of communication on networks have proved useful for simulating functional brain connectivity and predicting emergent network states. This Review surveys important aspects of communication dynamics in brain networks. We begin by sketching a conceptual framework that views communication dynamics as a necessary link between the empirical domains of structural and functional connectivity. We then consider how different local and global topological attributes of structural networks support potential patterns of network communication, and how the interactions between network topology and dynamic models can provide additional insights and constraints. We end by proposing that communication dynamics may act as potential generative models of effective connectivity and can offer insight into the mechanisms by which brain networks transform and process information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn.2017.149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Graph measures can describe how the brain's structural wiring supports communication between distant ROIs and cognitive systems.

    “At a global scale, graph measures can be used to describe how the brain’s structural wiring supports the communication of information between distant ROIs and cognitive systems (Avena-Koenigsberger et al., 2018; Mišić et al., 2015).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 202 · Cited by 856

Authors
Avena-Koenigsberger, A., Misic, B., & Sporns, O.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Sporns, Olaf
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2017-12-14
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
17-33
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2774446342
Cited by
856
References
202
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT009036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
communication dynamics, brain networks, structural connectivity, functional connectivity, effective connectivity, network topology, neuronal signaling, dynamic network model, brain information processing
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Mental Processes, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review