Cited by 16Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ketamine modifies mood through mTOR

Welberg, Leonie·2010·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn2916

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Li, N. et al. mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science 329, 959–964 (2010) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Welberg, L.
Corresponding author
Welberg, Leonie
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2010-09-02
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
666-667
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2078280300
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
ketamine, mTOR signaling, mood, antidepressant effects, mood regulation, synaptic plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review