Cited by 171Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesRenal and Vascular Pathologies

Epidemiology of hypertensive kidney disease

Udani, Suneel, Lazich, Ivana, Bakris, George L.·2011·Nature Reviews Nephrology

Abstract

The prevalence of hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) attributable to hypertension continues to rise worldwide. Identifying the precise prevalence of CKD attributable to hypertension is difficult owing to the absence of uniform criteria to establish a diagnosis of hypertensive nephropathy. Despite the increasing prevalence of CKD-associated hypertension, awareness of hypertension among individuals with CKD remains suboptimal and rates of blood-pressure control remain poor. Targeted subgroups involved in studies of CKD seem to reach better rates of blood-pressure control, suggesting that this therapeutic goal can be achieved in patients with CKD. Elevated blood-pressure levels are associated with CKD progression. However, the optimal blood-pressure level and pharmacological agent remains unclear. Physicians treating patients with CKD must recognize the importance of maintaining optimal salt and volume balance to achieve blood-pressure goals. Furthermore, agents that modify the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis can be an important adjunct to therapy and physicians must monitor expected changes in serum creatinine and electrolyte levels after their administration. Hypertension remains a common factor complicating CKD. Future investigations identifying early signs of hypertension-related CKD, increasing awareness of the effects of hypertension in CKD and determining optimal therapeutic interventions might help reduce the incidence of hypertensive nephropathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneph.2010.154

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hypertension causes over 40% of deaths in people with diabetes and is also a leading risk for fetal and maternal death in pregnancy, dementia, and renal failure (particularly in people of African ancestry) and can cause blindness.

    “Hypertension causes over 40% of deaths in people with dia -betes 11 and is also a leading risk for fetal and maternal death in pregnancy, dementia, and renal failure (particularly in people of African ancestry) and can cause blindness.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 171

Authors
Udani, S., Lazich, I., & Bakris, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Bakris, George L.
Venue
Nature Reviews Nephrology
Published
2010-11-16
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11-21
ISSN
  • 1745-8323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5061
  • 1759-507X
OpenAlex
W2089395529
Cited by
171
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
hypertensive nephropathy, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease progression, blood pressure control, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, antihypertensive therapy, prevalence, pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Continuing, Humans, Hypertension, Renal, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Biomarkers, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review