Cited by 214Electrolyte and hormonal disordersChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Vasopressin: a novel target for the prevention and retardation of kidney disease?

Bankir, Lise, Bouby, Nadine, Ritz, Eberhard·2013·Nature Reviews Nephrology

Abstract

After several decades during which little attention was paid to vasopressin and/or urine concentration in clinical practice, interest in vasopressin has renewed with the availability of new, potent, orally active vasopressin-receptor antagonists--the vaptans--and with the results of epidemiological studies evaluating copeptin (a surrogate marker of vasopressin) in large population-based cohorts. Several experimental studies in rats and mice had previously shown that vasopressin, acting via vasopressin V2 antidiuretic receptors, contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease; in particular, to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. New epidemiological studies now suggest a role for vasopressin in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and metabolic disorders via activation of hepatic V1a and/or pancreatic islet V1b receptors. The first part of this Review describes the adverse effects of vasopressin, as revealed by clinical and experimental studies in kidney diseases, hypertension, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. The second part provides insights into vasopressin physiology and pathophysiology that may be relevant to the understanding of these adverse effects and that are linked to the excretion of concentrated nitrogen wastes and associated hyperfiltration. Collectively, the studies reviewed here suggest that more attention should be given to the vasopressin-thirst-urine concentration axis in clinical investigations and in patient care. Whether selective blockade of the different vasopressin receptors may provide therapeutic benefits beyond their present indication in hyponatraemia requires new clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneph.2013.22

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 220 · Cited by 214

Authors
Bankir, L., Bouby, N., & Ritz, E.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Nierenzentrum Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Bankir, Lise
Venue
Nature Reviews Nephrology
Published
2013-02-26
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
223-239
ISSN
  • 1745-8323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5061
  • 1759-507X
OpenAlex
W2064249981
Cited by
214
References
220
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Université Paris Descartes
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
vasopressin, chronic kidney disease progression, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, cyst growth, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, vasopressin receptor antagonists, copeptin, V1a receptor, V1b receptor, hyperfiltration, urine concentration, thirst, hyponatremia
MeSH terms
Tolvaptan, Animals, Benzazepines, Humans, Hypertension, Renal, Vasopressins, Incidence, Prevalence, Disease Progression, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review