Cited by 734Acute Kidney Injury ResearchChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesNephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants

Acute kidney injury-epidemiology, outcomes and economics

Rewa, Oleksa, Bagshaw, Sean M.·2014·Nature Reviews Nephrology

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a widespread problem of epidemic status. Compelling evidence indicates that the incidence of AKI is rapidly increasing, particularly among hospitalized patients with acute illness and those undergoing major surgery. This increase might be partially attributable to greater recognition of AKI, improved ascertainment in administrative data and greater sensitivity of consensus diagnostic and classification schemes. Other causes could be an ageing population, increasing incidences of cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (CKD), and an expanding characterization of modifiable risk factors, such as sepsis, administration of contrast media and exposure to nephrotoxins. The sequelae of AKI are severe and characterized by increased risk of short-term and long-term mortality, incident CKD and accelerated progression to end-stage renal disease. AKI-associated mortality is decreasing, but remains unacceptably high. Moreover, the absolute number of patients dying as a result of AKI is increasing as the incidence of the disorder increases, and few proven effective preventative or therapeutic interventions exist. Survivors of AKI, particularly those who remain on renal replacement therapy, often have reduced quality of life and consume substantially greater health-care resources than the general population as a result of longer hospitalizations, unplanned intensive care unit admissions and rehospitalizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneph.2013.282

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rewa, O., & Bagshaw, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Nature Reviews Nephrology
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
193-207
ISSN
  • 1745-8323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5061
  • 1759-507X
OpenAlex
W1983640477
Cited by
734
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 10
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Nephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
acute kidney injury, incidence, mortality, economic burden, risk factors, sepsis, contrast media nephrotoxicity, nephrotoxins, chronic kidney disease progression, end-stage renal disease, renal replacement therapy, quality of life, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, hospital readmission, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Child, Creatinine, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Quality of Life, United States, Sepsis, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Acute Kidney Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review