Management of agitation and aggression associated with Alzheimer disease
Abstract
Agitation and aggression are frequently occurring and distressing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). These symptoms are disturbing for individuals with Alzheimer disease, commonly confer risk to the patient and others, and present a major management challenge for clinicians. The most widely prescribed pharmacological treatments for these symptoms-atypical antipsychotics-have a modest but significant beneficial effect in the short-term treatment (over 6-12 weeks) of aggression but limited benefits in longer term therapy. Benefits are less well established for other symptoms of agitation. In addition, concerns are growing over the potential for serious adverse outcomes with these treatments, including stroke and death. A detailed consideration of other pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to agitation and aggression in patients with Alzheimer disease is, therefore, imperative. This article reviews the increasing evidence in support of psychological interventions or alternative therapies (such as aromatherapy) as a first-line management strategy for agitation, as well as the potential pharmacological alternatives to atypical antipsychotics-preliminary evidence for memantine, carbamazepine, and citalopram is encouraging.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aberrant presenilin expression plays an important role in Alzheimer's disease, with behaviors such as agitation and aggression frequently occurring in patients.
“It has been shown that aberrant presenilin expression also plays an important role in Alzheimer’s disease, with behaviors such as agitation and aggression frequently occurring in patients [22, 50].”
From Gene expression profiles underlying aggressive behavior in the prefrontal cortex of cattle (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 404
- Authors
- Ballard, C. G., Gauthier, S., Cummings, J. L., Brodaty, H., Grossberg, G. T., Robert, P., & Lyketsos, C. G.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ballard, Clive G.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neurology
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 245-255
- ISSN
- 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4766
- OpenAlex
- W1992109356
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, agitation, aggression, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, atypical antipsychotics, adverse effects, non-pharmacological treatment, aromatherapy, psychological intervention, memantine, carbamazepine, citalopram, stroke risk
- MeSH terms
- Aggression, Alzheimer Disease, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Agitation, Antipsychotic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review