Cited by 616Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchHereditary Neurological DisordersAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 201 of the 202 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular pathways of motor neuron injury in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Open access

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a genetically diverse disease. At least 15 ALS-associated gene loci have so far been identified, and the causative gene is known in approximately 30% of familial ALS cases. Less is known about the factors underlying the sporadic form of the disease. The molecular mechanisms of motor neuron degeneration are best understood in the subtype of disease caused by mutations in superoxide dismutase 1, with a current consensus that motor neuron injury is caused by a complex interplay between multiple pathogenic processes. A key recent finding is that mutated TAR DNA-binding protein 43 is a major constituent of the ubiquitinated protein inclusions in ALS, providing a possible link between the genetic mutation and the cellular pathology. New insights have also indicated the importance of dysregulated glial cell-motor neuron crosstalk, and have highlighted the vulnerability of the distal axonal compartment early in the disease course. In addition, recent studies have suggested that disordered RNA processing is likely to represent a major contributing factor to motor neuron disease. Ongoing research on the cellular pathways highlighted in this Review is predicted to open the door to new therapeutic interventions to slow disease progression in ALS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.152

Cites

201 of 201 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Items 201–201 of 201

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 202 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fitzmaurice, P. S. et al. Evidence for DNA damage in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 19, 797–798 (1996).
  2. Highley, J. R. et al. TARDBP mutations, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and alternative splicing in human fibroblasts. Brain Pathol. 20 (Suppl. 1), 32 (2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 616

Metadata

Authors
Ferraiuolo, L., Kirby, J., Grierson, A. J., Sendtner, M., & Shaw, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Pamela J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2011-11
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
616-630
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2025413109
Cited by
615
References
202
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 45
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, motor neuron injury, motor neuron degeneration, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, excitotoxicity, superoxide dismutase 1, TDP-43, sporadic ALS, familial ALS, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Humans, Motor Neurons, Nerve Degeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review