Mechanisms of neurodegeneration and axonal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most frequent chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS, and imposes major burdens on young lives. Great progress has been made in understanding and moderating the acute inflammatory components of MS, but the pathophysiological mechanisms of the concomitant neurodegeneration--which causes irreversible disability--are still not understood. Chronic inflammatory processes that continuously disturb neuroaxonal homeostasis drive neurodegeneration, so the clinical outcome probably depends on the balance of stressor load (inflammation) and any remaining capacity for neuronal self-protection. Hence, suitable drugs that promote the latter state are sorely needed. With the aim of identifying potential novel therapeutic targets in MS, we review research on the pathological mechanisms of neuroaxonal dysfunction and injury, such as altered ion channel activity, and the endogenous neuroprotective pathways that counteract oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. We focus on mechanisms inherent to neurons and their axons, which are separable from those acting on inflammatory responses and might, therefore, represent bona fide neuroprotective drug targets with the capability to halt MS progression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease in which the myelin sheath surrounding axons is attacked by immune cells that enter the brain through a disrupted blood-brain barrier.
“MSis an autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease (184) in which the myelin sheath surrounding axons is attacked by immune cells, including leukocytes, T cells, B cells, and peripheral macrophages that enter the brain through a disrupted BBB (456).”
From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [184]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 165 · Cited by 628
- Authors
- Friese, M. A., Schattling, B., & Fugger, L.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Friese, Manuel A.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neurology
- Published
- 2014-03-18
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 225-238
- ISSN
- 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4766
- OpenAlex
- W2051274614
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 165
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (100308/Z/12/Z, 100308)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, neurodegeneration, axonal dysfunction, neuroaxonal damage, neuroprotection, ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, disease progression, disability
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Nerve Degeneration, Wallerian Degeneration, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Apoptosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review