Cited by 1,678Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 216 of the 216 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clearance systems in the brain—implications for Alzheimer disease

Open access

Abstract

Accumulation of toxic protein aggregates-amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau tangles-is the pathological hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD). Aβ accumulation has been hypothesized to result from an imbalance between Aβ production and clearance; indeed, Aβ clearance seems to be impaired in both early and late forms of AD. To develop efficient strategies to slow down or halt AD, it is critical to understand how Aβ is cleared from the brain. Extracellular Aβ deposits can be removed from the brain by various clearance systems, most importantly, transport across the blood-brain barrier. Findings from the past few years suggest that astroglial-mediated interstitial fluid (ISF) bulk flow, known as the glymphatic system, might contribute to a larger portion of extracellular Aβ (eAβ) clearance than previously thought. The meningeal lymphatic vessels, discovered in 2015, might provide another clearance route. Because these clearance systems act together to drive eAβ from the brain, any alteration to their function could contribute to AD. An understanding of Aβ clearance might provide strategies to reduce excess Aβ deposits and delay, or even prevent, disease onset. In this Review, we describe the clearance systems of the brain as they relate to proteins implicated in AD pathology, with the main focus on Aβ.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119

Cites

216 of 216 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–216 of 216

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hetzel, L. 65 Years and Over Population: 2000. Census 2000 Brief (DIANE Publishing, 2008).
  2. Milford, H. in Studies in Intracranial Physiology and Surgery 1st edn Ch. 1 (ed. Cushing, H.) 1–50 (Oxford University Press, 1926).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,678

Metadata

Authors
Tarasoff-Conway, J. M., Carare, R. O., Osorio, R. S., Glodzik, L., Butler, T., Fieremans, E., Axel, L., Rusinek, H., Nicholson, C., Zlokovic, B. V., Frangione, B., Blennow, K., Ménard, J., Zetterberg, H., Wisniewski, T., & de Leon, M. J.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Université Paris Descartes (FR)
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2015-07-21
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
457-470
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W1767010801
Cited by
1,678
References
216
Citations by year
2026: 165 · 2025: 178 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 183 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 129 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 15
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2016-03-29)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG008051, AG022374, R01AG022374, AG20245, AG 12101, R01AG012101, P30AG008051, R01AG020245, R01AG013616, AG 13616)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL118624, R01HL118624, HL111724, R01HL111724)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS028642, R01NS028642)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta clearance, glymphatic system, meningeal lymphatic vessels, blood-brain barrier, astrocytes, tau hyperphosphorylation, amyloid plaques, brain waste clearance
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins, Humans, Lymphatic System, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Extracellular Fluid, Proteolysis, Absorption, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review