Cited by 368PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerTuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The mTOR signalling cascade: paving new roads to cure neurological disease

Crino, Peter B.·2016·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

Defining the multiple roles of the mechanistic (formerly 'mammalian') target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway in neurological diseases has been an exciting and rapidly evolving story of bench-to-bedside translational research that has spanned gene mutation discovery, functional experimental validation of mutations, pharmacological pathway manipulation, and clinical trials. Alterations in the dual contributions of mTOR - regulation of cell growth and proliferation, as well as autophagy and cell death - have been found in developmental brain malformations, epilepsy, autism and intellectual disability, hypoxic-ischaemic and traumatic brain injuries, brain tumours, and neurodegenerative disorders. mTOR integrates a variety of cues, such as growth factor levels, oxygen levels, and nutrient and energy availability, to regulate protein synthesis and cell growth. In line with the positioning of mTOR as a pivotal cell signalling node, altered mTOR activation has been associated with a group of phenotypically diverse neurological disorders. To understand how altered mTOR signalling leads to such divergent phenotypes, we need insight into the differential effects of enhanced or diminished mTOR activation, the developmental context of these changes, and the cell type affected by altered signalling. A particularly exciting feature of the tale of mTOR discovery is that pharmacological mTOR inhibitors have shown clinical benefits in some neurological disorders, such as tuberous sclero…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.81

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 164 · Cited by 368

Authors
Crino, P. B.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Crino, Peter B.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2016-06-24
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
379-392
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2469298590
Cited by
368
References
164
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
mTOR signaling, neurological disorders, mTOR inhibitors, tuberous sclerosis complex, epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, neurodevelopmental disorders, brain tumors, traumatic brain injury, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, neurodegenerative diseases, autophagy, cell death, cell growth and proliferation, clinical trials
MeSH terms
Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Signal Transduction, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review