The mTOR signalling cascade: paving new roads to cure neurological disease
Abstract
Defining the multiple roles of the mechanistic (formerly 'mammalian') target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway in neurological diseases has been an exciting and rapidly evolving story of bench-to-bedside translational research that has spanned gene mutation discovery, functional experimental validation of mutations, pharmacological pathway manipulation, and clinical trials. Alterations in the dual contributions of mTOR - regulation of cell growth and proliferation, as well as autophagy and cell death - have been found in developmental brain malformations, epilepsy, autism and intellectual disability, hypoxic-ischaemic and traumatic brain injuries, brain tumours, and neurodegenerative disorders. mTOR integrates a variety of cues, such as growth factor levels, oxygen levels, and nutrient and energy availability, to regulate protein synthesis and cell growth. In line with the positioning of mTOR as a pivotal cell signalling node, altered mTOR activation has been associated with a group of phenotypically diverse neurological disorders. To understand how altered mTOR signalling leads to such divergent phenotypes, we need insight into the differential effects of enhanced or diminished mTOR activation, the developmental context of these changes, and the cell type affected by altered signalling. A particularly exciting feature of the tale of mTOR discovery is that pharmacological mTOR inhibitors have shown clinical benefits in some neurological disorders, such as tuberous sclero…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
mTORC1 dysregulation has been reported in Alzheimer's disease.
“Moreover, mTORC1 dysregulation has been reported in Alzheimer’s disease2.”
From mTORC1 drives cell-autonomous astrocyte reactivity in tuberous sclerosis (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 164 · Cited by 368
- Authors
- Crino, P. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crino, Peter B.
- ORCID
- Crino, Peter B.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neurology
- Published
- 2016-06-24
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 379-392
- ISSN
- 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4766
- OpenAlex
- W2469298590
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- mTOR signaling, neurological disorders, mTOR inhibitors, tuberous sclerosis complex, epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, neurodevelopmental disorders, brain tumors, traumatic brain injury, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, neurodegenerative diseases, autophagy, cell death, cell growth and proliferation, clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Signal Transduction, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review