Genome-wide mapping of long-range contacts unveils clustering of DNA double-strand breaks at damaged active genes
Open accessAbstract
The ability of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to cluster in mammalian cells has been a subject of intense debate in recent years. Here we used a high-throughput chromosome conformation capture assay (capture Hi-C) to investigate clustering of DSBs induced at defined loci in the human genome. The results unambiguously demonstrated that DSBs cluster, but only when they are induced within transcriptionally active genes. Clustering of damaged genes occurs primarily during the G1 cell-cycle phase and coincides with delayed repair. Moreover, DSB clustering depends on the MRN complex as well as the Formin 2 (FMN2) nuclear actin organizer and the linker of nuclear and cytoplasmic skeleton (LINC) complex, thus suggesting that active mechanisms promote clustering. This work reveals that, when damaged, active genes, compared with the rest of the genome, exhibit a distinctive behavior, remaining largely unrepaired and clustered in G1, and being repaired via homologous recombination in postreplicative cells.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DSBs have the potential to directly affect the 3D genome organization.
“DSBs have the potential to directly affect the 3D genome organization”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 263
- Authors
- Aymard, F., Aguirrebengoa, M., Guillou, E., Javierre, B. M., Bugler, B., Arnould, C., Rocher, V., Iacovoni, J. S., Biernacka, A., Skrzypczak, M., Ginalski, K., Rowicka, M., Fraser, P., & Legube, G.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Babraham Institute (GB)
- Inserm (FR)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Legube, Gaëlle
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2017-03-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-361
- ISSN
- 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-9993
- PMC
- PMC5385132
- OpenAlex
- W2594432738
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- ReIn UW (University of Warsaw) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE10-0002, ANR-13-BSV8-0013)
- Medical Research Council (MR/L007150/1)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM112131)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Keywords
- DNA double-strand breaks, long-range chromatin contacts, transcriptionally active genes, DNA damage, G1 cell cycle, DNA repair, homologous recombination, MRN complex, FMN2, LINC complex, nuclear actin, chromosome conformation capture
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Cell Line, Chromosome Mapping, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Histones, Humans, Models, Biological, Nuclear Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Tamoxifen, Transcription, Genetic, Genome, Human, Cluster Analysis, G1 Phase, DNA, Intergenic, RNA, Small Interfering, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review