Cited by 435MicroRNA in disease regulationRNA Research and SplicingPlant Molecular Biology Research

Perfect seed pairing is not a generally reliable predictor for miRNA-target interactions

Didiano, Dominic, Hobert, Oliver·2006·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

We use Caenorhabditis elegans to test proposed general rules for microRNA (miRNA)-target interactions. We show that G.U base pairing is tolerated in the 'seed' region of the lsy-6 miRNA interaction with its in vivo target cog-1, and that 6- to 8-base-pair perfect seed pairing is not a generally reliable predictor for an interaction of lsy-6 with a 3' untranslated region (UTR). Rather, lsy-6 can functionally interact with its target site only in specific 3' UTR contexts. Our findings illustrate the difficulty of establishing generalizable rules of miRNA-target interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsmb1138

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current target prediction algorithms often identify many false positive target genes and there is no strong overlap in predicted target gene list among prediction algorithms.

    “current target prediction algorithms often identify many false positive target genes and there is no strong overlap in the predicted target gene list among prediction algorithms [138-141].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 435

Authors
Didiano, D., & Hobert, O.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hobert, Oliver
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2006-08-20
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
849-851
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W2030093783
Cited by
435
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 41
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (5r03hd050334-02)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS050266, R01NS039996)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R03HD050334-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
miRNA-target interactions, 3' untranslated region, Caenorhabditis elegans, RNA secondary structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Caenorhabditis elegans, Base Pairing, 3' Untranslated Regions, MicroRNAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review