Cited by 116Obesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health Practices

Longitudinal Relationships Among Overweight, Life Satisfaction, and Aspirations in Young Women

Open access
Ball, Kylie, Crawford, David, Kenardy, Justin·2004·Obesity Research

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated associations of overweight status and changes in overweight status over time with life satisfaction and future aspirations among a community sample of young women. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 7865 young women, initially 18 to 23 years of age, completed two surveys that were 4 years apart. These women provided data on their future life aspirations in the areas of further education, work/career, marital status, and children, as well as their satisfaction with achievements to date in a number of life domains. Women reported their height and weight and their sociodemographic characteristics, including current socioeconomic status (occupation). Results: Young women's aspirations were cross‐sectionally related to BMI category, such that obese women were less likely to aspire to further education, although this relationship seemed explained largely by current occupation. Even after adjusting for current occupation, young women who were obese were more dissatisfied with work/career/study, family relationships, partner relationships, and social activities. Weight status was also longitudinally associated with aspirations and life satisfaction. Women who were overweight or obese at both surveys were more likely than other women to aspire to “other” types of employment (including self‐employed and unpaid work in the home) as opposed to full‐time employment. They were also less likely to be satisfied with study or partner relationships. Women who resolved their overweight/obesity status were more likely to aspire to being childless than other women. Discussion: These results suggest that being overweight/obese may have a lasting effect on young women's life satisfaction and their future life aspirations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2004.125

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most cross-sectional studies found women with obesity rated their self-reported PPWB significantly lower than men or women without obesity.

    “Most studies found women with obesity rated their self‐reported PPWB significantly lower than men or women without obesity. 2 , 42 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 52 , 55 , 57 , 58”

    From Positive psychological well-being in women with obesity: A scoping review of qualitative and quantitative primary research (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (p. 5) report that women with obesity were less likely than healthy-weight women to be satisfied in several areas of life, and the Discussion (p. 10) describes lower satisfaction in certain realms in a cross-sectional analysis. The study included only young women, so it does not support a comparison with men or a claim about psychological well-being generally rather than specific life-satisfaction measures. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Race was not included as a variable in the majority of studies.

    “Race was not included as a variable in the majority of studies. 35 , 41 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 62”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 116

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]8. Rothblum ED, Miller CT, Garbutt B. Stereotypes of obese female job applicants. Int J Eating Disord. 1988;7:277-83.
  2. [10]10. Pagan JA, Davila A. Obesity, occupational attainment and earnings. Soc Sci Qu . 1997;78:756-70.
  3. [11]11. Register CA, Williams DR. Wage effects of obesity among young workers. Soc Sci Qu . 1990;71:130-41.
  4. [16]16. Crandall CS. Prejudice against fat people: ideology and selfinterest. J Pers Soc Psych . 1994;66:882-94.

Authors
Ball, K., Crawford, D., & Kenardy, J.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Ball, Kylie
Venue
Obesity Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1019-1030
ISSN
  • 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-8528
OpenAlex
W1991019826
Cited by
116
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
overweight, obesity, young women, life satisfaction, life aspirations, body mass index, career aspirations, childlessness, employment aspirations, self-employment, unpaid domestic work, occupational status, family relationships, couple relationships
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aspirations, Psychological, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Family, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Obesity, Personal Satisfaction, Regression Analysis, Social Class, Cohort Studies, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review