Cited by 48Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The Figure Rating Scale as an Index of Weight Status of Women on Videotape

Open access
Cardinal, Tiffany M., Kaciroti, Niko, Lumeng, Julie C.·2006·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether Stunkard's Figure Rating Scale (FRS) is a valid and reliable index of weight status when an unbiased observer assigns the figure ratings of adult women viewed on videotape. Research Methods and Procedures: Seventy‐two women drawn from a community sample participated in a videotaped study in which height and weight were measured. The FRS is a rating scale displaying 9 silhouettes ranging from very thin to very obese. Women were assigned a figure rating “in‐person” by a research assistant (FRS used as a 17‐point scale) and by additional research assistants viewing women only on videotape (FRS used as both a 17‐ and 9‐point scale). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated for in‐person figure ratings, mean videotape figure ratings, and BMI. Results: BMI and in‐person figure ratings were highly correlated (r = 0.91), as were BMI and both mean 17‐point videotape figure ratings and mean 9‐point videotape figure ratings (r = 0.89 and 0.87, respectively). Inter‐rater agreement for in‐person figure ratings and mean 17‐point videotape figure ratings was 0.86, and agreement between in‐person figure ratings and mean 9‐point videotape figure ratings was 0.82. Discussion: The FRS can be used as an index of women's weight status by an unbiased observer, with subjects viewed in‐person or on videotape.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2006.249

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ratings of body size made from videotapes have been shown to be a valid representation of weight status.

    “Finally, ratings of body size made from videotapes have been shown to be a valid representation of weight status”

    From Body Size and Social Self-Image Among Adolescent African American Girls (2009) · cites this paper as Cardinal, Kaciroti, & Lumeng, 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Preva- lence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999 -2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723-7.
  2. Stunkard AJ, Sorensen TI, Schulsinger F, eds. Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the Study of Obesity and Thin- ness. New York: Raven Press; 1983.
  3. Striegel-Moore RH, Silberstein LR, Rodin J. Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia. Am Psychol. 1986; 41:246 -63.
  4. Fallon AE, Rozin P. Sex differences in perceptions of desir- able body shape. J Abnorm Psychol. 1985;94:102-5.
  5. Bulik CM, Wade TD, Heath AC, Martin NG, Stunkard AJ, Eaves LJ. Relating body mass index to figural stimuli: population-based normative data for Caucasians. Int J Obes. 2001;25:1517-24.
  6. Sorensen TI, Stunkard AJ, Teasdale TW, Higgins MW. The accuracy of reports of weight: children's recall of their parents' weights 15 years earlier. Int J Obes. 1983;7:115-22.
  7. Pulvers KM, Lee RE, Kaur H, et al. Development of a culturally relevant body image instrument among urban Afri- can Americans. Obes Res. 2004;12:1641-51.
  8. Hediger ML, Hartnett HJ, Louis GM. Association of en- dometriosis with body size and figure. Fertil Steril. 2005;84: 1366 -74.
  9. Must A, Phillips SM, Stunkard AJ, Naumova EN. Expert opinion on body mass index percentiles for figure drawings at menarche. Int J Obes. 2002;26:876 -9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardinal, T. M., Kaciroti, N., & Lumeng, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Cardinal, Tiffany M.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
2132-2135
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2110517851
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Heart Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
Figure Rating Scale, body image, weight status, body mass index, inter-rater reliability, women, obesity assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Videotape Recording, Body Mass Index, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review