A longitudinal study on the effect of shift work on weight gain in male Japanese workers.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effect of alternating shift work and day work on weight gain in Japanese male workers. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A longitudinal cohort study was conducted in day workers (n = 4,328) and alternating shift workers (n = 2,926) of a steel company who received annual health checkups over a 14-year period between 1991 and 2005. The association between the type of job schedule and weight gain was investigated using multivariate pooled logistic regression analyses. The endpoints in the study were either a 5, 7.5, or 10% increase in BMI during the period of observation, compared to the BMI at entry. RESULTS: The type of job schedule was significantly associated with all three BMI endpoints (5% increase in BMI; odds ratio (OR) for comparison between alternating shift workers and regular day workers, 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.23): (7.5% increase in BMI; OR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.03-1.24: 10% increase in BMI; OR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.00-1.28). BMI at study entry was also positively associated with the 5, 7.5, and 10% increases in BMI during the study. On the other hand, age and drinking habits were negatively associated with 5, 7.5, and 10% increases in BMI. DISCUSSION: Our study revealed that alternating shift work was an independent risk factor for weight gain in male Japanese workers. Efficient health screening and regular checkups, combined with support to control unhealthy lifestyle factors, would be of considerable benefit for maintaining the health of Japanese shift workers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 259
- Authors
- Suwazono, Y., Dochi, M., Sakata, K., Okubo, Y., Oishi, M., Tanaka, K., Kobayashi, E., Kido, T., & Nogawa, K.
- Affiliations
- Chiba University (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Suwazono, Yasushi
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1887-1893
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W2000952225
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- shift work, weight gain, body mass index, occupational health, steelworkers, male workers, drinking habits, age, lifestyle factors, health screening
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Japan, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Work Schedule Tolerance, Cohort Studies, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review