Cited by 100Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Weight Loss Maintenance Following a Primary Care Intervention for Low‐income Minority Women

Open access
Martin, Pamela D., Dutton, Gareth R., Rhode, Paula C., Horswell, Ronald L., Ryan, Donna H., Brantley, Phillip J.·2008·Obesity

Abstract

Although the primary care setting offers an innovative option for weight loss interventions, there is minimal research examining this type of intervention with low‐income minority women. Further, there is a lack of research on the long‐term effects of these programs. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the weight loss maintenance of low‐income African‐American women participating in a primary care weight management intervention. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with overweight and obese women (N = 144) enrolled at two primary care clinics. Women received a 6‐month tailored weight loss intervention delivered by their primary care physician and completed follow‐up assessments 9, 12, and 18 months following randomization. The weight loss maintenance of the tailored intervention was compared to a standard care comparison group. The weight loss of intervention participants (−1.52 ± 3.72 kg) was significantly greater than that of standard care participants (0.61 ± 3.37 kg) at month 9 (P = 0.01). However, there was no difference between the groups at the 12‐month or 18‐month follow‐ups. Participants receiving a tailored weight loss intervention from their physician were able to maintain their modest weight loss up to 3–6 months following treatment. Women demonstrated weight regain at the 18‐month follow‐up assessment, suggesting that more intensive follow‐up in the primary care setting may be needed to obtain successful long‐term weight loss maintenance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2008.399

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trials in which primary care providers offer counseling about diet and activity have led to weight loss of 2.5 kg or less over study periods ranging from 6 to 18 months.

    “Trials in which primary care providers (PCPs) offer counseling about diet and activity (i.e., lifestyle counseling) have led to weight loss of 2.5 kg or less over study periods ranging from 6 to 18 months.5–7”
  • Long-term weight loss in the enhanced lifestyle counseling group and in the brief lifestyle counseling group was greater than weight loss observed in other primary care trials, with the exception of a study involving extremely obese patients treated with intensive group lifestyle modification and weight-loss medications.

    “Long-term weight loss in the group that received enhanced lifestyle counseling (as well as in the group that received brief lifestyle counseling without enhancement) was greater than weight loss observed in other primary care trials,5–7,30,31 with the exception of a study involving extremely obese patients who were treated with intensive group lifestyle modification and weight-loss medications.32”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 100

Authors
Martin, P. D., Dutton, G. R., Rhode, P. C., Horswell, R. L., Ryan, D. H., & Brantley, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Baton Rouge General (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, Pamela D.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
2462-2467
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2003400880
Cited by
100
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK057476, P30DK072476)
  • Office of Research on Women's Health
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
weight loss maintenance, weight management interventions, primary care, low-income women, African American women, minority women, overweight, personalized interventions, weight regain, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Body Weight, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Obesity, Poverty, Primary Health Care, Socioeconomic Factors, Weight Loss, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review