Effects of Catechin Enriched Green Tea on Body Composition
Abstract
Obesity is a major health problem in the developed and developing world. Many "functional" foods and ingredients are advocated for their effects on body composition but few have consistent scientific support for their efficacy. However, an increasing amount of mechanistic and clinical evidence is building for green tea (GT). This experiment was therefore undertaken to study the effects of a high-catechin GT on body composition in a moderately overweight Chinese population. In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, 182 moderately overweight Chinese subjects, consumed either two servings of a control drink (C; 30 mg catechins, 10 mg caffeine/day), one serving of the control drink and one serving of an extra high-catechin GT1 (458 mg catechins, 104 mg caffeine/day), two servings of a high-catechin GT2 (468 mg catechins, 126 mg caffeine/day) or two servings of the extra high-catechin GT3 (886 mg catechins, 198 mg caffeine/day) for 90 days. Data were collected at 0, 30, 60, and 90 days. We observed a decrease in estimated intra-abdominal fat (IAF) area of 5.6 cm(2) in the GT3 group. In addition, we found decreases of 1.9 cm in waist circumference and 1.2 kg body weight in the GT3 group vs. C (P < 0.05). We also observed reductions in total body fat (GT2, 0.7 kg, P < 0.05) and body fat % (GT1, 0.6%, P < 0.05). We conclude that consumption of two servings of an extra high-catechin GT leads to improvements in body composition and reduces abdominal fatness in moderately overweight Chinese subjects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Daily consumption of a green tea extract drink providing 886 mg catechins and 198 mg caffeine/day for 90 days without calorie restriction resulted in the greatest percent decrease in intrabdominal and total fat mass and total body mass, attended by a slight decline in lean body mass.
“Daily consumption of a GTX drink providing 886 mg catechins and 198 mg caffeine/day resulted in the greatest percent decrease in intrabdominal and total fat mass and total body mass, attended by a slight decline in LBM [40].”
From Body Composition Changes in Weight Loss: Strategies and Supplementation for Maintaining Lean Body Mass, a Brief Review (2018) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 185
- Authors
- Wang, H., Wen, Y., Du, Y., Yan, X., Guo, H., Rycroft, J. A., Boon, N., Kovacs, E. M. R., & Mela, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Unilever (China) (CN)
- Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
- Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boon, Niels
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 773-779
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W1995081715
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Keywords
- green tea, catechins, body composition, intra-abdominal fat, waist circumference, weight loss, body fat percentage, caffeine, functional foods
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Body Weight, Catechin, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Tea, Anti-Obesity Agents, Camellia sinensis, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Abdominal Fat, Overweight, Waist Circumference, Functional Food
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review