Cited by 116Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Improved insulin sensitivity after exercise: focus on insulin signaling

Open access
Frøsig, Christian, Richter, Erik A.·2009·Obesity

Abstract

After a single bout of exercise, the ability of insulin to stimulate glucose uptake is markedly improved locally in the previously active muscles. This makes exercise a potent stimulus counteracting insulin resistance characterizing type 2 diabetes (T2D). It is believed that at least part of the mechanism relates to an improved ability of insulin to stimulate translocation of glucose transporters (GLUT4) to the muscle membrane after exercise. How this is accomplished is still unclear; however, an obvious possibility is that exercise interacts with the insulin signaling pathway to GLUT4 translocation allowing for a more potent insulin response. Parallel to unraveling of the insulin signaling cascade, this has been investigated within the past 25 years. Reviewing existing studies clearly indicates that improved insulin action can occur independent of interactions with proximal insulin signaling. In contrast, more recent observations indicate that interactions exist at the distal signaling level of AS160 and atypical protein kinase C (aPKC). Although the functional interpretation is lacking, these novel observations may present a breakthrough in understanding the beneficial interplay between exercise and insulin action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2009.383

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 116

Authors
Frøsig, C., & Richter, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Frøsig, Christian
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12
Volume
17
Issue
S3
Pages
S15-20
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2015919576
Cited by
116
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
physical activity, insulin sensitivity, insulin signaling, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, GLUT4 translocation, glucose uptake, AS160, atypical protein kinase C, muscle
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Blood Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Signal Transduction, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Glucose Transporter Type 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review