Reducing Portion Size Reduces Food Intake and Plate Waste
Open accessAbstract
As portion size (PS) increases, so does food intake. The effect of decreasing PS on food intake in a nonlaboratory setting is unknown. This 5-week study sought to determine whether decreasing PS resulted in decreased intake of the same food, and if so, at what point further PS reductions might lack benefit. It also assessed effects of PS reduction on food production and waste in a university all-you-can-eat dining facility (DF). Subjects were primarily freshmen who regularly ate lunch at the DF, and self-selected French fries (FF) presented in individual paper bags, portioned originally at 88 g, and decreased approximately 15 g/week for 3 weeks. Diners were covertly observed choosing one or more bags. Total FF production and plate waste (PW) were determined daily. Decreasing PS resulted in significant decreases in consumption per diner (P < 0.05) and PW (P < 0.05), and nonsignificant decreases in total FF consumption and production. PS was positively correlated with consumption per diner (r = 0.897, P = 0.001) and PW (r = 0.852, P = 0.001), but inversely correlated with number of diners choosing >or=2 bags (r = -0.809, P = 0.003). Total FF production was positively correlated with PW (r = 0.728, P = 0.011). This study shows that reducing PS of a particular item in an all-you-can-eat environment results in reduced intake of that food for most individuals, and that reducing PS reduces PW and food production.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 31% reduction in french fries waste was enabled by moving to smaller portion sizes.
“A 31% reduction in french fries waste was enabled by moving to smaller 277 portion sizes (Freedman and Brochado, 2010).”
From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Freedman and Brochado, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 198
- Authors
- Freedman, M. R., & Brochado, C.
- Affiliations
- San Jose State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freedman, Marjorie R.
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1864-1866
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W1990784270
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- San Jose State University Scholar Works (San Jose State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- portion size, dietary intake, plate waste, French fries, food production, dietary habits, portion size reduction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Energy Intake, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Food Services, Humans, Solanum tuberosum, Universities, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review