Cited by 198Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Reducing Portion Size Reduces Food Intake and Plate Waste

Open access
Freedman, Marjorie R., Brochado, Carolina·2010·Obesity

Abstract

As portion size (PS) increases, so does food intake. The effect of decreasing PS on food intake in a nonlaboratory setting is unknown. This 5-week study sought to determine whether decreasing PS resulted in decreased intake of the same food, and if so, at what point further PS reductions might lack benefit. It also assessed effects of PS reduction on food production and waste in a university all-you-can-eat dining facility (DF). Subjects were primarily freshmen who regularly ate lunch at the DF, and self-selected French fries (FF) presented in individual paper bags, portioned originally at 88 g, and decreased approximately 15 g/week for 3 weeks. Diners were covertly observed choosing one or more bags. Total FF production and plate waste (PW) were determined daily. Decreasing PS resulted in significant decreases in consumption per diner (P < 0.05) and PW (P < 0.05), and nonsignificant decreases in total FF consumption and production. PS was positively correlated with consumption per diner (r = 0.897, P = 0.001) and PW (r = 0.852, P = 0.001), but inversely correlated with number of diners choosing >or=2 bags (r = -0.809, P = 0.003). Total FF production was positively correlated with PW (r = 0.728, P = 0.011). This study shows that reducing PS of a particular item in an all-you-can-eat environment results in reduced intake of that food for most individuals, and that reducing PS reduces PW and food production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2009.480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 198

Authors
Freedman, M. R., & Brochado, C.
Affiliations
San Jose State University (US)
Corresponding author
Freedman, Marjorie R.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1864-1866
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1990784270
Cited by
198
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • San Jose State University Scholar Works (San Jose State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
portion size, dietary intake, plate waste, French fries, food production, dietary habits, portion size reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Energy Intake, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Food Services, Humans, Solanum tuberosum, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review