Cited by 32Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPeripheral Artery Disease Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Obesity Paradox in Amputation Risk Among Nonelderly Diabetic Men

Open access

Abstract

The association between BMI and amputation risk is not currently well known. We used data for a cohort of diabetic patients treated in the US Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System in 2003. Men aged <65 years at the end of follow‐up were examined for their amputation risk and amputation‐free survival during the next 5 years (2004–2008). Compared to overweight individuals (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m 2), the risks of amputation and treatment failure (amputation or death) were higher for patients with BMI <25 kg/m 2 and were lower for those with BMI ≥30 kg/m 2. Individuals with BMI ≥40 kg/m 2 were only half as likely to experience any (hazard ratios (HR) = 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30–0.80) and major amputations (HR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39–0.73) during follow‐up as overweight individuals. While the amputation risk continued to decrease for higher BMI, amputation‐free survival showed a slight upturn at BMI >40 kg/m 2. The association between obesity and amputation risk in our data shows a pattern consistent with “obesity paradox” observed in many health conditions. More research is needed to better understand pathophysiological mechanisms that may explain the paradoxical association between obesity and lower‐extremity amputation (LEA) risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2011.301

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 32

Metadata

Authors
Sohn, M., Budiman‐Mak, E., Oh, E. H., Park, M. S., Stuck, R. M., Stone, N. J., & Pearce, W. B.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Loyola University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sohn, Min‐Woong
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
460-462
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1978261100
Cited by
32
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL094293)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Keywords
obesity paradox, lower limb amputation, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, amputation risk, amputation-free survival, veterans, diabetic men, treatment failure
MeSH terms
Adult, Amputation, Surgical, Diabetic Neuropathies, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Lower Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review