Cited by 281Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchImmune cells in cancerCancer Cells and Metastasis

Macrophages mediate gemcitabine resistance of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by upregulating cytidine deaminase

Weizman, N, Krelin, Y, Shabtay-Orbach, A, Amit, M, Binenbaum, Y, Wong, R J, Gil, Z·2014·Oncogene

Abstract

Resistance to pharmacologic agents used in chemotherapy is common in most human carcinomas, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), which is resistant to almost all drugs, including gemcitabine, a nucleoside analog used as a first-line treatment. Poor survival rates of PDA patients have, therefore, not changed much over 4 decades. Recent data indicated that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which are abundant in the microenvironment of several tumors, including PDA, secrete pro-tumorigenic factors that contribute to cancer progression and dissemination. In this study, we show for the first time that TAMs can also induce chemoresistance of PDA by reducing gemcitabine-induced apoptosis. Macrophages co-cultured with cancer cells or TAM-conditioned medium significantly reduced apoptosis and activation of the caspase-3 pathway during gemcitabine treatment. In vivo PDA models of mice, which have reduced macrophage recruitment and activation, demonstrated improved response to gemcitabine compared with controls. Similarly, inhibition of monocytes/macrophages trafficking by a CSF1-receptor antagonist GW2580 augmented the effect of gemcitabine in a transgenic mouse PDA model that was resistant to gemcitabine alone. Analysis of multiple proteins involved in gemcitabine delivery and metabolism revealed that TAMs induced upregulation of cytidine deaminase (CDA), the enzyme that metabolizes the drug following its transport into the cell. Decreasing CDA expression by PDA cells…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/onc.2013.357

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 281

Authors
Weizman, N., Krelin, Y., Shabtay-Orbach, A., Amit, M., Binenbaum, Y., Wong, R. J., & Gil, Z.
Affiliations
  • Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Gil, Z
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2013-09-02
Volume
33
Issue
29
Pages
3812-3819
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2032131517
Cited by
281
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, gemcitabine resistance, tumor-associated macrophages, cytidine deaminase, chemoresistance, apoptosis, caspase-3, macrophage trafficking, GW2580, drug metabolism, paracrine signaling, tumor microenvironment
MeSH terms
Gemcitabine, Adenocarcinoma, Animals, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Cytidine Deaminase, Deoxycytidine, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Macrophages, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Receptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Mice, Knockout, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review