Oncogene-induced senescence underlies the mutual exclusive nature of oncogenic KRAS and BRAF
Abstract
KRAS and BRAF are among the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human cancer that contribute to tumorigenesis in both distinct and overlapping tissues. However, KRAS and BRAF mutations are mutually exclusive; they never occur in the same tumor cell. The reason for the mutual exclusivity is unknown, but there are several possibilities. The two mutations could be functionally redundant and not create a selective advantage to tumor cells. Alternatively, they could be deleterious for the tumor cell and induce apoptosis or senescence. To distinguish between these possibilities, we activated the expression of BRAF(V600E) and KRAS(G12D) from their endogenous promoters in mouse lungs. Although the tumor-forming ability of BRAF(V600E) was higher than KRAS(G12D), KRAS(G12D) tumors were larger and more advanced. Coactivation of BRAF(V600E) and KRAS(G12D) markedly reduced lung tumor numbers and overall tumor burden compared with activation of BRAF(V600E) alone. Moreover, several tumors expressed only one oncogene, suggesting negative selection against expression of both. Similarly, expression of both oncogenes in mouse embryonic fibroblasts essentially stopped proliferation. The expression of both oncogenes hyperactivated the MEK-ERK-cyclin D pathway but reduced proliferation by increasing the production of p15, p16 and p19 proteins encoded by the Ink4/Arf locus and thereby increased senescence-associated β-galactosidase-positive cells. The data suggest that coexpression of BRAF(V600E) and KRAS(G12D) in early tumorigenesis leads to negative selection due to oncogene-induced senescence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several KRAS alleles had reduced comutation with NRAS and BRAF, and increased comutation with APC and PIK3CA.
“Several KRAS alleles had reduced comutation with NRAS and BRAF, and increased comutation with APC and PIK3CA”
From The origins and genetic interactions of KRAS mutations are allele- and tissue-specific (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Cisowski, J., Sayin, V. I., Liu, M., Karlsson, C., & Bergo, M. O.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- Oncogene
- Published
- 2015-06-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1328-1333
- ISSN
- 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5594
- OpenAlex
- W1542666708
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oncogene (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancerfonden
- IngaBritt och Arne Lundbergs Forskningsstiftelse
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- oncogene-induced senescence, KRAS, BRAF, BRAF V600E mutation, G12D mutation, oncogenic mutations, mutual exclusivity, MEK/ERK signaling, cyclin D, INK4/ARF locus, p16, p15, p19, senescence-associated β-galactosidase, lung cancer, mouse embryonic fibroblasts, carcinogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Fibroblasts, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Cellular Senescence, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Mice, Genetic Loci, Carcinogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review