Cited by 104Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Oncogene-induced senescence underlies the mutual exclusive nature of oncogenic KRAS and BRAF

Cisowski, J, Sayin, V I, Liu, M, Karlsson, C, Bergo, M O·2016·Oncogene

Abstract

KRAS and BRAF are among the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human cancer that contribute to tumorigenesis in both distinct and overlapping tissues. However, KRAS and BRAF mutations are mutually exclusive; they never occur in the same tumor cell. The reason for the mutual exclusivity is unknown, but there are several possibilities. The two mutations could be functionally redundant and not create a selective advantage to tumor cells. Alternatively, they could be deleterious for the tumor cell and induce apoptosis or senescence. To distinguish between these possibilities, we activated the expression of BRAF(V600E) and KRAS(G12D) from their endogenous promoters in mouse lungs. Although the tumor-forming ability of BRAF(V600E) was higher than KRAS(G12D), KRAS(G12D) tumors were larger and more advanced. Coactivation of BRAF(V600E) and KRAS(G12D) markedly reduced lung tumor numbers and overall tumor burden compared with activation of BRAF(V600E) alone. Moreover, several tumors expressed only one oncogene, suggesting negative selection against expression of both. Similarly, expression of both oncogenes in mouse embryonic fibroblasts essentially stopped proliferation. The expression of both oncogenes hyperactivated the MEK-ERK-cyclin D pathway but reduced proliferation by increasing the production of p15, p16 and p19 proteins encoded by the Ink4/Arf locus and thereby increased senescence-associated β-galactosidase-positive cells. The data suggest that coexpression of BRAF(V600E) and KRAS(G12D) in early tumorigenesis leads to negative selection due to oncogene-induced senescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/onc.2015.186

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 104

Authors
Cisowski, J., Sayin, V. I., Liu, M., Karlsson, C., & Bergo, M. O.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
1328-1333
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W1542666708
Cited by
104
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancerfonden
  • IngaBritt och Arne Lundbergs Forskningsstiftelse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
oncogene-induced senescence, KRAS, BRAF, BRAF V600E mutation, G12D mutation, oncogenic mutations, mutual exclusivity, MEK/ERK signaling, cyclin D, INK4/ARF locus, p16, p15, p19, senescence-associated β-galactosidase, lung cancer, mouse embryonic fibroblasts, carcinogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Fibroblasts, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Cellular Senescence, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Mice, Genetic Loci, Carcinogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review