Cited by 31Child Welfare and AdoptionBirth, Development, and HealthChild Nutrition and Water Access

Early growth faltering in post-institutionalized youth and later anthropometric and pubertal development

Open access
Reid, Brie M, Miller, Bradley S, Dorn, Lorah D, Desjardins, Christopher, Donzella, Bonny, Gunnar, Megan·2017·Pediatric Research

Abstract

BackgroundEarly-life adversity that increases the risk of growth stunting is hypothesized to increase the risk of obesity and, in girls, early-onset puberty. This hypothesis was tested in children adopted from orphanages.MethodsPost-institutionalized (PI) youth were compared with youth reared in comparable families (non-adopted; NA) on height, weight, pubertal stage, and fat mass (127 PI, 80 female; 156 NA, 85 female, aged 7-14 years). Anthropometric findings at adoption were obtained from first US clinic visits.ResultsOverall, 25% of PI youth were height-stunted (<3rd percentile) at adoption. Years post adoption, PI youth had lower BMI-for-age (P=0.004), height-for-age (P<0.001), and less body fat (P<0.001) than NA youth had, but they did not differ by sex. Pubertal status did not differ by group or sex. The anthropometric findings held when the stunted-at-adoption subset was examined; they were also less likely to be in central puberty than other PI youth.ConclusionEarly deprived orphanage care increases the risk of growth stunting but not obesity in children adopted into US families, and it does not independently contribute to early-onset puberty for PI girls. The role of the environment following early adversity may modify the impact of early adverse care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/pr.2017.35

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 31

Authors
Reid, B. M., Miller, B. S., Dorn, L. D., Desjardins, C., Donzella, B., & Gunnar, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Reid, Brie M
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
278-284
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W2587155620
Cited by
31
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (#00039202)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD075349)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
orphanage care, childhood adversity, stunting, anthropometric development, pubertal timing, childhood obesity, fat mass, body mass index for age, adoption, precocious puberty
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anthropometry, Child, Female, Growth, Humans, Male, Puberty, Orphanages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review