A Mechanistic, Multiscale Mathematical Model of Immunogenicity for Therapeutic Proteins: Part 2—Model Applications
Open accessAbstract
A mechanistic, multiscale mathematical model of immunogenicity for therapeutic proteins was built by recapitulating key underlying known biological processes for immunogenicity. The model is able to simulate immune responses based on protein‐specific antigenic properties (e.g., number of T‐epitopes and their major histocompatibility complex (MHC)‐II binding affinities) and host‐specific immunological/physiological characteristics (e.g., MHC‐II allele genotype, drug clearance rate). Preliminary validation was performed using mouse studies with antigens such as ovalbumin (OVA) or OVA‐derived peptide. Further, using adalimumab as an example therapeutic protein, the model is able to simulate immune responses against adalimumab in individual subjects and in a population, and also provides estimations of immunogenicity incidence and drug exposure reduction that can be validated experimentally. This is a first attempt at modeling immunogenicity of biologics, so the model simulations should be used to help understand the immunogenicity mechanisms and impacting factors, rather than making direct predictions. This prototype model needs to be subjected to extensive experimental validation and refinement before fulfilling its ultimate mission of predicting immunogenicity. Nevertheless, the current model could potentially set up the starting framework to integrate various in silico, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical immunogenicity assessment results to help meet the challenge of immunogenicity prediction. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. (2014) 3, e134; doi:10.1038/psp.2014.31; published online 03 September 2014
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature search excluded many relevant publications that do not include "systems" or "QSP" in their title and highly impactful models published elsewhere.
“As a caveat, this excludes many relevant publications that do not include “systems” or “QSP” in their title10, 11 and highly impactful models published elsewhere.12”
From Reproducibility of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Chen, X., Hickling, T., & Vicini, P.
- Affiliations
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc Andover Massachusetts USA
- Corresponding author
- Vicini, P
- ORCID
- Vicini, P
- Venue
- CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 2163-8306 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4211264
- OpenAlex
- W2121700939
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Keywords
- immunogenicity, therapeutic proteins, biologics, multiscale mathematical model, adalimumab, ovalbumin, drug clearance, immunogenicity prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review